Skip to main content
. 2017 May 23;2017(5):CD002811. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002811.pub4

Summary of findings 4. Coasting versus follicle stimulating hormone administration at time of hCG for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Coasting versus follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) administration at time of hCG trigger in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)
Population: Women undergoing assisted reproduction
 Setting: Assisted reproduction clinics
 Intervention: Coasting
 Comparison: FSH co‐trigger with hCG administration
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with FSH co‐trigger with hCG administration Risk with Coasting
OHSS Not estimable Not estimable OR 43.74
 (2.54 to 754.58) 102
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 VERY LOW1,2  
Live birth No data available  
Clinical Pregnancy 510 per 1000 489 per 1000
 (309 to 676) OR 0.92
 (0.43 to 2.01) 102
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝1,3 
 LOW  
Multiple pregnancy No data available  
Miscarriage No data available  
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the mean risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; hCG: human chorionic gonadotrophin
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded one level due to serious risk of bias: method of sequence generation not reported, lack of blinding

2 Downgraded two levels due to very serious imprecision: only 15 events, all in one arm.

3 Downgraded one level due to serious imprecision: very wide confidence intervals