Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004816. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004816.pub5
Study Reason for exclusion
Agewall 2006 Treatment length was less than a year
ALLHAT‐LLT 2002 15% patients had history of CVD
Ames 2011 No relevant outcomes reported
Anderson 1993 No placebo ‐ statin + antioxidant versus statin + antioxidant
ASCOT‐LLA 2003 18% patients had history of CVD
ASTRONOMER 2010 Study is not a primary prevention
Bak 1998 Treatment length was less than a year
BCAPS 2001 11% patients had history of CVD
Boccuzzi 1991 Not a RCT ‐ all participants were given Simvastatin
Branchi 1995 Control Group was not randomised
Byington 1993 Secondary prevention
CASHMERE 2007 Treatment length was less than a year
Cassader 1993 Treatment length was less than a year
CHALLENGER Patients with CHD were included in study
Chan 1996 Treatment length was less than a year
Chuengsamarn 2010 Study is not a RCT
CLIP 2002 Not a RCT ‐ All participants were given Pravastatin
Cowan 2010 Follow‐up duration was inadequate
Coylewright 2008 Secondary prevention
CRISP 1994 Treatment length was less than a year
CURVES 1998 No placebo ‐ statin versus statin
Dangas 1999 Treatment length was less than a year
Davidson 1997 No placebo ‐ statin versus statin
Duffy 2001 Treatment length was less than a year
Egashira 1994 Not a RCT ‐ All participants were given Pravastatin
Eriksson 1998 No control group ‐ Pravastatin vs. Cholestyramine
EXCEL 1990 Treatment length was less than a year
Faergeman 2009 Comparison of two statins/doses
FAST 2002 Over 40% had CVD and over 14% had CHD
Ferrari 1993 Treatment length was less than a year
Gentile 2000 Treatment length was only 24 weeks
Glasser 1996 Length of treatment was only 12 weeks
Gomez‐Garcia 2007 Follow‐up period was less than a year
Guisasola 2009 Study is not a RCT
Hokuriku NK‐104 Study 02 Not a RCT ‐ All participants were given intravasating
Hongo 2010 No placebo control group
Hufnagel 2000 Treatment length was less than a year
Italian Family Physician Not a RCT ‐ open‐labelled
Jardine 2006 Outcomes provided were aggregated. Unable to ascertain actual numbers for cardiac death and myocardial infarction.
JART 2011 Comparison was between two types of statin
JELIS 2009 No placebo/control group and study was a secondary prevention
J‐LIT 2007 Study is not a RCT
Jones 1991 Treatment length was less than a year
Kappelle 2009 Treatment length was less than a year
KLIS 2000 Not randomised
Kojima 2010 Secondary prevention
Lemaitre 2002 Cohort study
Lin 2010 No relevant outcomes reported.
LIPID 2010 Secondary prevention
Mareev 2008 Previous history of cardiovascular disease in most patients
McDermott 2003 Participants were not randomised to statins or no statins
Mizuguchi 2008 Study outcomes are not relevant to current review.
Mohler 2003 Patients recruited had peripheral arterial disease
Mok 2009 Secondary prevention
Muldoon 1997 Treatment length is only six months
Nephrotic Syndrome Study Treatment length was less than a year
Ohta 2000 Treatment length was less than a year
Oi 1997 No placebo or control group
Olzowy 2007 Outcomes of the study are not relevant to review.
Ormiston 2003 Not a RCT ‐ all participants were given statins
Pavia 2000 Intervention included Amlodipine
Pitt 1999 No placebo ‐ statins versus angioplasty
POSCH 1990 Statins were not used
Pravastatin Multi 1993 Treatment length was less than a year
PROSPER 2002 More than 10% of the participants had CVD
Safaei 2007 Study is not a RCT
SANDS 2008 Comparison of two different treatment algorithms which included statins
Schmermund 2006 Comparision of 10 mg vs 80 mg of statin.
Sen 2000 Treatment length was less than a year
Sprecher 1994 Treatment length was less than a year
Stein 1997 Treatment length was less than a year
Su 2000 Treatment length was less than a year
Tanaka 2001 Treatment length was less than a year
Tarin 2010 Secondary prevention
Teixeira 2011 No relevant outcomes
Tekin 2008 Not randomised
Thomas 1993 Treatment length was less than a year
Thrombosis Prevention Statins were not used
Togha 2009 Patients had a chronic disease.
Tran 2007 The data are based on inadequate length of treatment
Wallace 2003 Treatment length was less than a year
Wu 2007 No comparison group
Yu‐An 1998 Treatment length was less than one year
Zachoval 2000 Comparison of two statins

CHD: coronary heart disease
CVD: cardiovascular disease
RCT: randomised controlled trial