Kim 2016a.

Methods	RCT Mobility CCT versus usual care therapy
Participants	20 participants (intervention = 10, comparison = 10), mean time since stroke 30.0 days, mean age 65.6, score 3 or 4 on Functional Ambulation Classification (able to walk with no more than 1 person assisting), less than 3 months post‐stroke
Interventions	Intervention: mobility‐related CCT, including trunk exercises, active sitting practice, sit‐to‐stand practice, standing and walking practice, aerobic exercise and strength training; 90 min/per day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks Comparison: usual care physiotherapy provided in 2 x 30‐min sessions, 5 x per week for 4 weeks. Content based on neurodevelopmental approach and provided in one‐to‐one therapy sessions Staff:participant ratio: at least 2 participants to 1 therapist
Outcomes	6mWT, BBS, modified Barthel Index (Korean version), lower limb score of the Fugl‐Meyer assessment
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Randomised via sealed envelope technique, random sequence generation not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	High risk	No mention of allocation concealment
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes	Low risk	Assessors blinded to group allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Low risk	No missing data
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Unclear risk	No trial protocol
Other bias	Low risk	No other sources of bias identified