Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;2017(5):CD006109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006109.pub3

Summary of findings 3. Oestrogen compared to no pretreatment for ovarian stimulation protocols for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.

Oestrogencompared to no pretreatment for ovarian stimulation protocols for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques
Patient or population: ovarian stimulation protocols for women undergoing ART
Settings:
Intervention: oestrogen
Comparison: no pretreatment
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk1 Corresponding risk
No pretreatment Oestr
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy
(Oestr + Ant vs Ant)
299 per 1000 252 per 1000 
 (184 to 333) OR 0.79 
 (0.53 to 1.17) 502
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate2
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy
(Oestr + Ant vs Ag)
350 per 1000 322 per 1000 
 (215 to 447) OR 0.88 
 (0.51 to 1.5) 242
 (2 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Very low3,4
Pregnancy loss
(Oestr + Ant vs Ant)
208 per 1000 40 per 1000 
 (5 to 279) OR 0.16 
 (0.02 to 1.47) 49
 (1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Very low3,4
Pregnancy loss
(Oestr + Ant vs Ag)
72 per 1000 110 per 1000 
 (46 to 240) OR 1.59 
 (0.62 to 4.06) 220
 (1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Very low3,4
Multiple pregnancy rate
(Oestr + Ant vs Ant)
No data available
Multiple pregnancy rate
(Oestr + Ant vs Ag)
Not calculable ‐ see comment OR 2.24 
 (0.09 to 53.59) 22
 (1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Very low3,4 Only 2 events (both in oestrogen group)
OHSS rate
(Oestr + Ant vs Ant)
No data available
OHSS rate
(Oestr + Ant vs Ag)
18 per 1000 27 per 1000
(5 to 147)
OR 1.54
(0.25 to 9.42)
220
(1 study)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Very low3,4
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 Ag: agonist; Ant: antagonist; ART: assisted reproductive techniques; CI: confidence interval; Oestr: oestrogen; OHSS: ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; OR: odds ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Mean baseline risk of control group.
 2 Downgraded one level for serious imprecision: effect estimate with wide confidence intervals.
 3 Downgraded one level for serious risk of bias due to poor reporting on allocation concealment or high attrition (or both).
 4 Downgraded two levels for very serious imprecision: small sample size and effect estimate with wide confidence intervals.