Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 4;2015(6):CD010446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010446.pub2

Summary of findings for the main comparison. CHM versus antibiotics for women with recurrent UTI.

CHM versus antibiotics for women with recurrent UTI
Patient or population: women with recurrent UTI
 Settings: China
 Intervention: CHM
 Comparison: antibiotics
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Antibiotics CHM
Effectiveness Study population RR 1.24 
 (1.13 to 1.37) 282 (3) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low  
764 per 1000 948 per 1000 
 (864 to 1000)
Moderate
769 per 1000 954 per 1000 
 (869 to 1000)
Recurrence 
 Follow‐up: mean 5 months Study population RR 0.28 
 (0.09 to 0.82) 282 (3) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low  
550 per 1000 154 per 1000 
 (50 to 451)
Moderate
712 per 1000 199 per 1000 
 (64 to 584)
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

CHM ‐ Chinese herbal medicine; UTI ‐ urinary tract infection