Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 4;2015(6):CD010446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010446.pub2

Comparison 3. CHM versus CHM.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Effectiveness 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Recurrence 2 140 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.40 [0.21, 0.77]