Skip to main content
. 2017 May 19;2017(5):CD011598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011598.pub2

Comparison 19. Oral ‐ Serious adverse event end of intervention.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Serious adverse events ‐ overall 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
2 Serious adverse events ‐ bias 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
2.1 High risk of bias 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
2.2 Low risk of bias 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Serious adverse events ‐ by medical specialty 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
3.1 Cardiology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 Medical gastroenterology and hepatology 1 36 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.45 [0.10, 2.01]
3.3 Geriatrics 10 1609 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.56, 0.97]
3.4 Pulmonary disease 2 93 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.49 [0.16, 1.54]
3.5 Endocrinology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.6 Infectious diseases 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.7 Rheumatology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.8 Haematology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.9 Nephrology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.10 Gastroenterologic surgery 10 1253 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.66, 1.25]
3.11 Trauma surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.12 Ortopaedics 4 371 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.69 [0.53, 5.36]
3.13 Plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.14 Vascular surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.15 Transplant surgery 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.35 [0.02, 8.09]
3.16 Urology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.17 Thoracic surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.18 Neurological surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.19 Oro‐maxillo‐facial surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.20 Anaesthesiology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.21 Emergency medicine 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.22 Psychiatry 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.23 Neurology 3 4092 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.74, 1.24]
3.24 Oncology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.25 Dermatology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.26 Gynaecology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.27 Mixed 2 1078 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.24 [0.73, 2.12]
4 Serious adverse events ‐ based on adequacy of the amount of calories 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
4.1 Clearly adequate in intervention and clearly inadequate in control 4 246 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.33, 3.02]
4.2 Inadequate in the experimental or adequate in the control 13 5590 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.76, 1.10]
4.3 Experimental group is overfed 2 69 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.53 [0.14, 1.98]
4.4 Unclear intake in control or experimental 14 2664 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.63, 1.34]
5 Serious adverse events ‐ different screening tools 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
5.1 NRS 2002 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.2 MUST 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.3 MNA 2 117 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.61 [0.12, 3.18]
5.4 SGA 1 529 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.51 [0.99, 2.31]
5.5 Other means 30 7923 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.74, 1.01]
6 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to one of the following conditions 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
6.1 Major surgery 10 612 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.22, 2.08]
6.2 Stroke 2 4063 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.74, 1.24]
6.3 ICU participants including trauma 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6.4 Frail elderly participants with less severe conditions known to increase protein requirements 11 1063 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.52, 1.15]
6.5 Participants do not fall into one of the categories above 10 2831 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.70, 1.26]
7 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to one of the following criteria 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
7.1 BMI less than 20.5 kg/m2 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.35 [0.02, 8.09]
7.2 Weight loss of at least 5% during the last three months 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.3 Weight loss of at least 10% during the last six months 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.4 Insufficient food intake during the last week (50% of requirements or less) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.5 Participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' by other means 32 8532 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
8 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to biomarkers or anthropometrics 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
8.1 Biomarkers 1 60 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.12, 1.50]
8.2 Anthropometric measures 6 1111 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.52, 1.16]
8.3 Mixed 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
8.4 Characterised by other means 26 7398 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.95 [0.81, 1.12]
9 Serious adverse events ‐ randomisation year 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
9.1 Before 1960 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9.2 1960 to 1979 1 60 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.24, 2.43]
9.3 1980 to 1999 18 6988 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.73, 1.01]
9.4 After 1999 14 1521 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.61, 1.82]
10 Serious adverse events ‐ trials where the intervention lasts fewer than three days compared with trials where the intervention lasts three days or more 33 8569 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.79, 1.06]
10.1 Three days or more 31 8480 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.80, 1.06]
10.2 Less than three days 1 39 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
10.3 Unknown 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.25 [0.01, 5.00]
11 Serious adverse events ‐ 'best‐worst case' scenario 33 8844 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.52, 0.86]
12 Serious adverse events ‐ 'worst‐best case' scenario 33 8844 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.27 [0.92, 1.75]
13 Serious adverse events co‐interventions 134 21960 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.84, 0.99]
13.1 received nutrition support as co‐intervention 8 5178 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.79, 1.17]
13.2 did not receive nutrition support as co‐intervention 119 16359 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.83, 0.99]
13.3 delayed versus early nutrition support 7 423 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.51, 1.57]