Skip to main content
. 2017 May 19;2017(5):CD011598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011598.pub2

Comparison 24. Enteral ‐ Serious adverse event maximum follow‐up.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Serious adverse events ‐ overall 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
2 Serious adverse events ‐ bias 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
2.1 High risk of bias 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
2.2 Low risk of bias 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Serious adverse events ‐ by medical speciality 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
3.1 Cardiology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 Medical gastroenterology and hepatology 4 289 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.65, 1.23]
3.3 Geriatrics 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.4 Pulmonary disease 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.5 Endocrinology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.6 Infectious diseases 1 56 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.23 [0.52, 2.93]
3.7 Rheumatology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.8 Haematology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.9 Nephrology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.10 Gastroenterologic surgery 21 1456 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.68 [0.51, 0.91]
3.11 Trauma surgery 5 245 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.58 [0.30, 1.11]
3.12 Ortopaedics 4 248 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.28, 2.96]
3.13 Plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.14 Vascular surgery 1 13 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.15 Transplant surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.16 Urology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.17 Thoracic surgery 2 548 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.15 [0.02, 1.27]
3.18 Neurological surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.19 Oro‐maxillo‐facial surgery 1 32 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.44, 1.78]
3.20 Anaesthesiology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.21 Emergency medicine 4 213 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.60, 1.40]
3.22 Psychiatry 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.23 Neurology 4 1172 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.58 [0.34, 1.00]
3.24 Oncology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.25 Dermatology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.26 Gynaecology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.27 Mixed 2 153 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.18, 2.21]
4 Serious adverse events ‐ based on adequacy of the amount of calories 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
4.1 Clearly adequate in intervention and clearly inadequate in control 12 987 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.54, 0.96]
4.2 Inadequate in the experimental or adequate in the control 8 411 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.55, 1.35]
4.3 Experimental group is overfed 4 215 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.42, 1.42]
4.4 Unclear intake in control or experimental 25 2812 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.60, 0.94]
5 Serious adverse events ‐ different screening tools 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
5.1 NRS 2002 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.2 MUST 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.3 MNA 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.4 SGA 1 323 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.13, 1.06]
5.5 Other means 48 4102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.74, 0.92]
6 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to one of the following conditions 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
6.1 Major surgery 26 2139 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.51, 0.88]
6.2 Stroke 4 1172 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.58 [0.34, 1.00]
6.3 ICU participants including trauma 9 458 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.56, 1.14]
6.4 Frail elderly participants with less severe conditions known to increase protein requirements 2 126 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.24 [0.05, 95.92]
6.5 Participants do not fall into one of the categories above 8 530 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.69, 1.19]
7 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to one of the following criteria 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
7.1 BMI less than 20.5 kg/m2 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.2 Weight loss of at least 5% during the last three months 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.3 Weight loss of at least 10% during the last six months 1 32 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.44, 1.78]
7.4 Insufficient food intake during the last week (50% of requirements or less) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.5 Participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' by other means 48 4393 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.81 [0.72, 0.91]
8 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to biomarkers or anthropometrics 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
8.1 Biomarkers 3 551 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.16 [0.02, 1.26]
8.2 Anthropometric measures 2 122 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.24, 2.08]
8.3 Both 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
8.4 Characterised by other means 44 3752 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.74, 0.92]
9 Serious adverse events ‐ randomisation year 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
9.1 Before 1960 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9.2 1960 to 1979 1 26 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.36 [0.10, 19.50]
9.3 1980 to 1999 28 2591 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.77, 1.00]
9.4 After 1999 20 1808 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.58, 0.85]
10 Serious adverse events ‐ trials where the intervention lasts fewer than three days compared with trials where the intervention lasts three days or more 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.82 [0.73, 0.91]
10.1 Three days or more 41 3893 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.66, 0.89]
10.2 Less than three days 8 532 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.60, 1.22]
10.3 Unknown 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
11 Serious adverse events co‐interventions 49 4425 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.70, 0.87]
11.1 Received nutrition support as co‐intervention 3 126 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.39, 1.12]
11.2 did not receive nutrition support as co‐intervention 39 3918 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.68, 0.86]
11.3 delayed versus early nutrition support 7 381 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.68, 1.64]
12 Serious adverse events ‐ 'best‐worse case' scenario (enteral nutrition) 48 4489 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.51, 0.75]
13 Serious adverse events ‐ 'worst‐best case' scenario (enteral nutrition) 48 4489 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.81 [0.69, 0.95]