Skip to main content
. 2017 May 19;2017(5):CD011598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011598.pub2

Comparison 27. Parenteral ‐ Serious adverse event end of intervention.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Serious adverse events ‐ overall 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
2 Serious adverse events ‐ bias 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
2.1 High risk of bias 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
2.2 Low risk of bias 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Serious adverse events ‐ by medical specialty 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
3.1 Cardiology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 Medical gastroenterology and hepatology 7 259 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.29 [0.73, 2.29]
3.3 High risk 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.4 Geriatrics 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.5 Pulmonary disease 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.22 [0.01, 4.08]
3.6 Endocrinology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.7 Infectious diseases 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.8 Rheumatology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.9 Haematology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.10 Nephrology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.11 Gastroenterologic surgery 24 1663 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.56, 1.10]
3.12 Trauma surgery 2 45 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.66, 2.25]
3.13 Ortopaedics 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.14 Plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.15 Vascular surgery 2 35 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.5 [0.05, 4.67]
3.16 Transplant surgery 2 47 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.61 [0.23, 1.65]
3.17 Urology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.18 Thoracic surgery 1 44 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.6 [0.40, 6.32]
3.19 Neurological surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.20 Oro‐maxillo‐facial surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.21 Anaesthesiology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.22 Emergency medicine 4 5044 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.81, 1.24]
3.23 Psychiatry 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.24 Neurology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.25 Oncology 4 277 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.12 [0.51, 2.44]
3.26 Dermatology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.27 Gynaecology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.28 Mixed 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Serious adverse events ‐ based on adequacy of the amount of calories 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
4.1 Clearly adequate in intervention and clearly inadequate in control 9 5736 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.80, 1.19]
4.2 Inadequate in the experimental or adequate in the control 5 218 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.20 [0.74, 1.95]
4.3 Experimental group is overfed 1 124 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.52 [0.19, 1.47]
4.4 Unclear intake in control or experimental 33 1441 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.65, 1.23]
5 Serious adverse events ‐ different screening tools 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
5.1 NRS 2002 1 4640 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.83, 1.30]
5.2 MUST 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.3 MNA 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.4 SGA 1 323 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.28, 1.83]
5.5 Other means 46 2556 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.95 [0.77, 1.17]
6 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to one of the following conditions 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
6.1 Major surgery 30 1952 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.66, 1.13]
6.2 Stroke 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6.3 ICU participants including trauma 6 5089 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.84, 1.25]
6.4 Frail elderly participants with less severe conditions known to increase protein requirements 2 114 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.06, 5.63]
6.5 Participants do not fall into one of the categories above 10 364 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.69, 2.02]
7 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to one of the following criteria 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
7.1 BMI less than 20.5 kg/m2 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.2 Weight loss of at least 5% during the last three months 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.3 Weight loss of at least 10% during the last six months 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.4 Insufficient food intake during the last week (50% of requirements or less) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.5 Participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' by other means 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
8 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to biomarkers or anthropometrics 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
8.1 Biomarkers 3 77 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.39 [0.06, 2.39]
8.2 Anthropometric measures 3 137 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.16, 3.01]
8.3 Mixed 3 75 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.14, 3.07]
8.4 Characterised by other means 39 7230 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.86, 1.16]
9 Serious adverse events ‐ randomisation year 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
9.1 Before 1960 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9.2 1960 to 1979 3 98 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.02 [0.82, 4.98]
9.3 1980 to 1999 37 1754 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.95 [0.76, 1.19]
9.4 After 1999 8 5667 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.79, 1.20]
10 Serious adverse events ‐ trials where the intervention lasts fewer than three days compared with trials where the intervention lasts three days or more 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.85, 1.14]
10.1 Three days or more 46 7412 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.85, 1.15]
10.2 Less than three days 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.12, 3.78]
10.3 Unknown 1 27 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
11 Serious adverse events ‐ 'best‐worst case' scenario 48 8293 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.63, 0.98]
12 Serious adverse events ‐ 'worst‐best case' scenario 48 8293 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.95, 1.42]
13 Serious adverse events co‐interventions 48 7519 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.81, 1.09]
13.1 received nutrition support as co‐intervention 5 5049 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.83, 1.26]
13.2 did not receive nutrition support as co‐intervention 42 2390 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.70, 1.07]
13.3 delayed versus early nutrition support 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.12, 3.78]