Skip to main content
. 2017 May 19;2017(5):CD011598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011598.pub2

Comparison 28. Parenteral ‐ Serious adverse event maximum follow‐up.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Serious adverse events ‐ overall 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
2 Serious adverse events ‐ bias 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
2.1 High risk of bias 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
2.2 Low risk of bias 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Serious adverse events ‐ by medical speciality 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
3.1 Cardiology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 Medical gastroenterology and hepatology 7 338 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.69, 1.33]
3.3 Geriatrics 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.4 Pulmonary disease 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.22 [0.01, 4.08]
3.5 Endocrinology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.6 Infectious diseases 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.7 Rheumatology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.8 Haematology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.9 Nephrology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.10 Gastroenterologic surgery 27 2066 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.72, 1.16]
3.11 Trauma surgery 2 45 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.66, 2.25]
3.12 Ortopaedics 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.13 Plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.14 Vascular surgery 2 35 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.5 [0.05, 4.67]
3.15 Transplant surgery 2 47 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.22, 1.42]
3.16 Urology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.17 Thoracic surgery 1 44 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.6 [0.40, 6.32]
3.18 Neurological surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.19 Oro‐maxillo‐facial surgery 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.20 Anaesthesiology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.21 Emergency medicine 7 5208 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.84, 1.12]
3.22 Psychiatry 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.23 Neurology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.24 Oncology 6 375 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.87, 1.20]
3.25 Dermatology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.26 Gynaecology 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.27 Mixed 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Serious adverse events ‐ based on adequacy of the amount of calories 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
4.1 Clearly adequate in intervention and clearly inadequate in control 9 5736 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.88, 1.10]
4.2 Inadequate in the experimental or adequate in the control 4 165 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.17 [0.80, 1.72]
4.3 Experimental group is overfed 5 583 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.74, 1.32]
4.4 Unclear intake in control or experimental 38 1779 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.73, 1.11]
5 Serious adverse events ‐ different screening tools 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
5.1 NRS 2002 1 4640 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.85, 1.18]
5.2 MUST 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.3 MNA 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5.4 SGA 1 323 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.28, 1.83]
5.5 Other means 54 3300 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.88, 1.08]
6 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to one of the following conditions 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
6.1 Major surgery 34 2447 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.75, 1.09]
6.2 Stroke 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6.3 ICU participants including trauma 7 5209 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.86, 1.14]
6.4 Frail elderly participants with less severe conditions known to increase protein requirements 2 114 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.06, 5.63]
6.5 Participants do not fall into one of the categories above 13 493 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.88, 1.18]
7 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to one of the following criteria 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
7.1 BMI less than 20.5 kg/m2 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.2 Weight loss of at least 5% during the last three months 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.3 Weight loss of at least 10% during the last six months 2 92 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 7.78]
7.4 Insufficient food intake during the last week (50% of requirements or less) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7.5 Participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' by other means 54 8171 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
8 Serious adverse events ‐ participants characterised as 'at nutritional risk' due to biomarkers or anthropometrics 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
8.1 Biomarkers 6 184 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.45 [0.13, 1.57]
8.2 Anthropometric measures 3 137 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.29, 1.89]
8.3 Both 3 75 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.66 [0.14, 3.07]
8.4 Characterised by other means 44 7867 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.90, 1.08]
9 Serious adverse events ‐ randomisation year 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
9.1 Before 1960 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9.2 1960 to 1979 4 154 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.38 [0.67, 2.83]
9.3 1980 to 1999 44 2442 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.88, 1.10]
9.4 After 1999 8 5667 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.83, 1.12]
10 Serious adverse events ‐ trials where the intervention lasts fewer than three days compared with trials where the intervention lasts three days or more 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]
10.1 Three days or more 54 8156 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.89, 1.07]
10.2 Less than three days 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.2 [0.59, 2.45]
10.3 Unknown 1 27 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
11 Serious adverse events ‐ 'best‐worst case' scenario 56 8452 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.68, 0.94]
12 Serious adverse events ‐ 'worst‐best case' scenario 56 8452 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.12 [0.96, 1.30]
13 Serious adverse events co‐interventions 56 8263 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.85, 1.04]
13.1 Received nutrition support as co‐intervention 6 5164 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.85, 1.12]
13.2 did not receive nutrition support as co‐intervention 49 3019 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.77, 1.04]
13.3 delayed versus early nutrition support 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.2 [0.59, 2.45]