Skip to main content
. 2017 May 19;2017(5):CD011598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011598.pub2

Peng 2001.

Methods Randomised clinical trial, China
Participants 22 hospitalised adults admitted with severe burn injuries (TBSA > 50%), at nutritional risk due to trauma
Male:Female = 15:7
Mean age = 31 years
Exclusion criteria: moderate‐to‐severe inhalation injury, diarrhoea or ileus
Interventions Experimental group: Early enteral feeding. Participants were given ENSURE (carbohydrate 54.5%, protein 14%, lipid 31.5%) oral or nasal feeding. 78 ‐ 80 ml/3hr, 0.75 Kcal/ml in first 24 hrs after burn, 100 ‐ 150 ml/3hr, 0.75 ‐ 1 Kcal/ml within the next 24 hrs.(n = 13)
Control group: Delayed enteral feeding. Oral liquid diet 48 hrs after burn(n = 9)
Co‐intervention: Conventional therapy
Outcomes Plasma, endotoxin TNF‐α, urine mannitol, urinary lactulose
Study dates Not stated
Notes We tried and failed 3 times to contact the author by phone.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Participants and personnel were not blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The number of participants with incomplete data was not reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol could be obtained and the trial did not report on all‐cause mortality or serious adverse events.
For‐profit bias Unclear risk It was unclear how the trial was funded.
Other bias Low risk The trial appeared to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias.