Skip to main content
. 2017 May 19;2017(5):CD011598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011598.pub2

Reissman 1995.

Methods Randomised clinical trial, USA
Participants 161 hospitalised adults undergoing major abdominal surgery, at nutritional risk due to major surgery
Male:Female = 77:84
Mean age = 53.5 years
Interventions Experimental group: Early feeding group, clear liquid diet on 1st postoperative day, and advanced to a regular diet with 24 ‐ 48 hrs(n = 80)
 Control group: Regular feeding. Nothing by mouth until resolution of ileus(n = 81)
Outcomes Vomiting, abdominal distention, length of ileus, tolerance of regular diet, length of hospitalisation, and complications
Study dates November 1992 and April 1994
Notes We could obtain no contact information for the authors.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk The number of participants with incomplete data was not reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All‐cause mortality and serious adverse events were reported.
For‐profit bias Unclear risk It was unclear how the trial was funded.
Other bias Low risk The trial appeared to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias.