Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 11;2017(6):CD009613. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009613.pub3

Comparison 6.

Constant CGM versus intermittent CGM

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Caesarean section 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.33, 1.79]
2 Weight gain during pregnancy 1 25 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.5 [‐1.82, 2.82]
3 Insulin dosage, 3rd trimester (IU/kg/day) 1 25 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.03 [‐1.30, 1.24]
4 Glycaemic control ‐ Maternal blood glucose (1st trimester) 1 25 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.5 [‐2.70, 1.70]
5 Glycaemic control ‐ Maternal blood glucose (3rd trimester) 1 25 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.14 [‐2.00, 1.72]
6 Glycaemic control ‐ Maternal HbA1c (1st trimester) 1 25 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.30 [‐1.13, 0.53]
7 Glycaemic control ‐ Maternal HbA1c (3rd trimester) 1 25 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.09 [‐0.69, 0.51]
8 Maternal hypoglycemia 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.54 [0.06, 5.24]
9 Diabetic ketoacidosis (not pre‐specified) 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.02, 8.05]
10 Preterm birth < 37 weeks 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.08, 15.46]
11 Macrosomia 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.08, 15.46]
12 Neonatal hypoglycaemia 1 25 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]