Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 22;2017(6):CD011947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011947.pub2

Kaya 2005.

Methods RCT; participants randomised (> 1 wound per person, all followed)
 Funding: non‐industry funding ‐ declaration of interest: none. Setting: hospital with spinal chord injury
 Duration of follow‐up unclear weeks
 Unit of analysis: ulcer
Participants 27 participants with pressure ulcers. PU Stage: 1 (24% and 25% of ulcers), 2 (68% and 71%) and 3 (results separate, but best to combine) (PU classification: NPUAP)
 Age: mean (SD): 35.3 (14.6), range 16‐56 years and 29.7 (6.4), range 17‐39 years. Duration of ulcer: not stated. Ulcer size: mean (SD): 4.13 (2.73; range: 2‐13) cm²; reporting of control group unclear: range 2‐35 cm²
 Wound characteristics at baseline: no wounds infected; slough not reported; necrosis not reported; exudate not reported
 Comment: spinal chord injury (78% complete, 22% incomplete SCI); 15 participants/25 ulcers and 12 participants/24 ulcers
Interventions Group 1: hydrogel dressing ‐ Elastogel (not in BNF); n = 15. Grouped intervention category: advanced dressing
 Group 2: iodine containing dressing ‐ povidone iodine soaked gauze; n = 12. Grouped intervention category: antimicrobial dressing
Outcomes Primary outcomes: complete healing not reported; time to complete healing not reported
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Selection bias Unclear risk Sequence generation unclear ‐ “randomised”. Allocation concealment unclear ‐ no information on allocation concealment. Baseline comparability adequate ‐ no suggestion of problems. Rating: unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear ‐ no information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Missing data: Group 1 ‐ 0. Group 2 ‐ 0; i.e. no missing data (no details)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Adequate ‐ full results reported
Other bias 
 unit of analysis High risk Unit of randomisation person and unit of analysis ulcer ‐ for combination of stages I and II and III, ulcer:person ratio = 25/15 (1.7) and 24/12 (2.0)
Other bias 
 additional Unclear risk Adequate ‐ no suggestion of problems
ALL‐DOMAIN RISK OF BIAS High risk Rating: high
 Comments: unclear selection bias, unclear blinding; unit of analysis issues