Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 22;2017(6):CD011947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011947.pub2

Thomas 2005.

Methods RCT; participants randomised (only 1 wound per person)
 Funding: not stated. Setting: care home and outpatients
 Duration of follow‐up 12 weeks
 Unit of analysis: person (1 ulcer/person)
Participants 41 participants with pressure ulcers. PU Stage: III (55% and 52%) or IV (PU classification: not stated)
 Age: mean (SD): 77.0 (11.5) years and 74.1 (13.8) years. Duration of ulcer: not stated. Ulcer size: mean (SD): 12.1 (18.2) cm² and 11.0 (9.5) cm²
 Wound characteristics at baseline: no wounds infected; slough not reported; necrosis not reported; exudate not reported
 Comment: one ulcer evaluated per person
Interventions Group 1: hydrocolloid with or without alginate ‐ DuoDERM with or without Sorbasan: calcium alginate filler given as needed if the wound was highly exudative. Dressing changed every 7 d; n = 20. Grouped intervention category: advanced dressing
 Group 2: ineligible intervention ‐ radiant heat (dressing change every 7 d); n = 21. Grouped intervention category: ineligible ‐ radiant heat
Outcomes Primary outcomes: proportion completely healed at 12 weeks; time to complete healing reported (Kaplan Meier plot included)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Selection bias Unclear risk Sequence generation adequate ‐ computer‐generated. Allocation concealment unclear ‐ "opaque envelopes". Baseline comparability adequate ‐ no suggestion of problems. Rating: unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not blinded to interventions – deduced from interventions
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Missing data: Group 1 ‐ 4/20 (20%) (1 died, 3 hospitalised). Group 2 ‐ 6/21 (29%) (2 died, 2 hospitalised, 2 dropped out for non‐study‐related reasons)
 i.e. similar rate missing in both groups; high rate ‐ comparable with control event rate
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Adequate ‐ full results reported
Other bias 
 unit of analysis Low risk Unit of randomisation person and unit of analysis person (1 ulcer/person) ‐ unclear if selected
Other bias 
 additional Unclear risk Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists
ALL‐DOMAIN RISK OF BIAS High risk Rating: very high
 Reasons: unclear selection bias, not blinded, attrition bias
 Comments: outcome assessed at each visit after removing dressing ‐ not blinded
ALL‐DOMAIN RISK OF BIAS 2 High risk