TABLE II.
Comparison of prevalent animal species used as in vivo wound healing models.
| Model | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Rodent | • Strong understanding of genetic makeup | • Skin characteristics present differences in the healing mechanism |
| • Multiple specialized models available | • Differences in hair growth | |
| • Chronic healing models available | • High physical activity of animal can impact wound healing environment | |
| • Relatively low cost to house and maintain | • Irrelevant wound size | |
| • Simple surgical operations | ||
| Pig | • Skin is similar to humans | • Lack of specialized models |
| • Comparable healing characteristics to humans | • Ethical considerations | |
| • Generation of wounds at relevant scales | • Complex surgical operations | |
| • High cost to house and maintain | ||
| • Need for specialized facilities |