Abstract
We report here on the early pathology of a well-established murine model of dissecting abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Continuous infusion of angiotensin II (AngII) into apolipoprotein E-deficient mice induces the formation of aortic dissection and expansion at some point after implantation of miniosmotic pumps containing AngII. While this model has been studied extensively at a chronic stage, we investigated the early pathology of dissecting AAA formation at multiple scales. Using high-frequency ultrasound, we screened 12-week-old male mice daily for initial formation of these aneurysmal lesions between days 3 and 10 post-implantation. We euthanized animals on the day of diagnosis of a dissecting AAA or at day 10 if no aneurysmal lesion developed. Aortic expansion and reduced vessel wall strain occurred in animals regardless of whether a dissecting AAA developed by day 10. The aortas of mice that did not develop dissecting AAAs showed intermediate changes in morphology and biomechanical properties. RNA sequencing and gene expression analysis revealed multiple proinflammatory and matrix remodeling genes to be upregulated in the suprarenal aorta of AngII-infused mice as compared to saline-infused controls. Histology and immunohistochemistry confirmed that extracellular matrix remodeling and inflammatory cell infiltration, notably neutrophils and macrophages, occurred in AngII-infused mice with and without dissecting AAAs but not saline-infused controls. Understanding early disease processes is a critical step forward in translating experimental results in cardiovascular disease research. This work advances our understanding of this well-established murine model with applications for improving early diagnosis and therapy of acute aortic syndrome in humans.
INTRODUCTION
Aortic rupture is an often fatal consequence of aortic dissections and aneurysms. The ultimate goal of aortic disease research is to prevent aortic rupture and decrease the high mortality associated with many types of aortic disease. Research efforts towards novel treatment strategies1,2 and biomarkers3,4 have been ongoing for many years, but there has been less emphasis on early versus later disease processes. Understanding early disease processes has the potential benefit of identifying high risk patients who would benefit from treatment of small aneurysms and do not meet the current criteria for surgical intervention.
Over the past 20 years, dissecting murine abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) induced via angiotensin II (AngII)5,6 have become a valuable model for studying focal aortic dissection and expansion as well as intramural thrombus formation. These pathological features are often found in the thoracic aorta of humans with acute aortic syndrome.7 Conversely, human AAAs typically form below the level of the kidneys and exhibit slow expansion with gradual circumferential vessel wall destruction and remodeling.8 The AngII-induced dissecting AAA model also has features of atherosclerosis, inflammation, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, all of which are found in human aortic disease. While these have been well studied via histology and molecular analysis at a mature stage, it is difficult to study the early pathology of this model9–11 without knowing if and when an animal has already developed a focal dissection and aortic expansion. The aneurysmal lesions appear to develop suddenly on the order of minutes to hours,12 and therefore, determining the earliest time point in development is difficult. With increased access to small animal imaging systems, including micro-computed tomography,13 high-field magnetic resonance imaging,14 and high-frequency ultrasound (US),15,16 there have been multiple noninvasive longitudinal in vivo imaging studies examining experimental aortic disease models. However, AngII-induced dissecting AAAs show variable incidence rates,17 have abrupt and variable formation, and are not diagnosable without imaging prior to euthanasia. Some studies have thus misinterpreted AAA prevalence18 and possibly overlooked or misidentified aneurysmal lesions depending upon the criteria used.
Our previous imaging and characterization work with the AngII model motivated the present study. We previously tracked in vivo changes in aortic morphology and biomechanics in AngII-infused apoE-/- mice over 28 days.19 While we measured progressive volumetric growth on average, we noted large differences, particularly in timing and volume, among animals. For this reason, we conducted a second study to investigate in more detail progression on an animal-specific basis.20 We first repeatedly screened the animals between days 3 and 21 post-implantation in order to determine the timing of initial aortic expansion for each mouse. Not all animals developed a dissecting AAA while others experienced sudden aortic rupture and died. We imaged each animal with a dissecting AAA for an additional 7 days after identification of initial aortic expansion. This study demonstrated that four lesions (identified on days 6 and 9 post-implantation) were heterogeneous in terms of early volumetric growth, thrombus deposition, false lumen flow, and hemodynamic metrics, including time averaged wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, and formation of vortices.
For the present study, we implemented a daily US screening approach to diagnose aortic dissections within 24 h of formation. Thus, the physiological and molecular factors responsible for vessel wall remodeling are already active in these aneurysmal lesions. We hypothesize that similar factors in humans could be responsible for initiation of vessel wall remodeling and play a role in development. Furthermore, this work is of particular interest as the majority of patients diagnosed with AAAs have aortic diameters less than 5 cm and do not meet the criteria for surgical intervention. Indeed, understanding early AAA formation and progression could be helpful to improve translational strategies for the medical treatment of small aneurysms.
We compared differences in early disease progression among three experimental cohorts (AngII AAA, AngII No AAA, and saline) of male apoE-/- mice at 12 weeks of age at baseline. Based on previous studies,14,19–22 we selected day 10 as the cutoff for screening AngII-infused animals that did not develop a dissecting AAA (AngII No AAA). We tested the hypothesis that a proinflammatory phenotype and microstructural defects develop in the suprarenal aorta as early as day 3 of AngII infusion and are sufficient to induce a dissecting AAA. We also hypothesized that the suprarenal wall would exhibit reduced circumferential cyclic strain (CCS) that is correlated with the dissection severity as seen by histology. Furthermore, based on a previous study by Usui et al.,23 we investigated whether animals in the AngII AAA cohort have higher aortic gene expression and activation of IL-1β, as compared to the AngII No AAA and saline cohorts. Finally, we investigated whether animals in the AngII No AAA cohort exhibit an intermediate state of inflammation and ECM remodeling that does not result in full vessel wall breakage. The results of this work provide a wealth of information on the early pathology of dissection and aortic expansion in the suprarenal mouse aorta. This study has implications for future research on acute aortic syndrome in humans and the investigation of potential biomarkers and treatment strategies for aortic disease.
RESULTS
AngII infusion led to abrupt dissecting AAA formation over a range of diagnosis days
Of the 15 AngII-infused animals, 7 developed a dissecting AAA by day 10 (47%; AngII AAA cohort), 5 did not develop a dissection (33%; AngII No AAA cohort), and 3 became moribund or experienced an aortic rupture (20%; excluded from study). None of the 5 saline-infused mice (Saline cohort) developed a dissecting AAA. Table I provides the breakdown of animal numbers and timing used to assign each animal. Two animals were diagnosed as early as day 3 post-implantation; none were diagnosed on either of the two final days (days 9 and 10). Classification to the AngII AAA or AngII No AAA cohort was made according to the daily check of B-mode, M-mode, and Color Doppler data (see the section on Methods). B-mode and M-mode data acquired at i) baseline, ii) on a screening day, iii) on a diagnosis day, and iv) on day 10 are provided for visual reference (supplementary material, Fig. 1 and Movie I).
TABLE I.
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) for AngII-infused animals increased modestly but significantly from baseline values after at least 6 days of infusion (supplementary material, Table I). Baseline values ranged from 86 to 108 mm Hg across all animals (AngII AAA: 97.4 ± 5.7 mm Hg; AngII No AAA: 101.8 ± 4.5 mm Hg; Saline: 95.6 ± 6.7 mm Hg). SBP increased to 124.5 ± 8.5 mm Hg (n = 8 of the 12 animals), and the averages were similar between the AngII AAA and AngII No AAA cohorts (118.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg and 128 ± 9.1 mm Hg, respectively). The change in SBP was minimal for the two animals measured in the Saline cohort.
AngII infusion led to volumetric growth and strain reduction regardless of the dissecting AAA status
The average volume/length of the suprarenal aorta increased significantly from baseline for both the AngII AAA (140.9% ± 29.4%; p < 0.001) and AngII No AAA (66.7% ± 16.4%, p < 0.05) cohorts. Interestingly, there were statistically significant differences among all three cohorts at the animal-specific endpoint: AngII AAA and AngII No AAA (59.6% ± 8.7%; p < 0.001); AngII AAA and saline (122.5% ± 15.2%; p < 0.001); and AngII No AAA and saline (39.4% ± 5.0%; p < 0.05) [Fig. 1(a)].
Volume/length values increased by more than 100% in six of the seven AngII AAA animals (108%–217%). Individual values for the combined false lumen and thrombus volume (i.e., total dissecting AAA volume minus true lumen volume) normalized by the length of the final dissecting AAA were similar across animals and constituted a large proportion of the total AAA volume (80% ± 6%; 73%–89%). For the seven dissecting AAAs, the axial lengths varied between 4.41 mm and greater than 14.92 mm (9.72 ± 3.18 mm) and the distal end of the aneurysmal lesions was observed both above and below the right renal artery. For one case, abdominal gas obscured the aorta proximal to the superior mesenteric artery at the endpoint and the volume was estimated in this region. Volumetric renderings calculated from 3D US segmentations [Fig. 1(b)] reveal the differences in vessel expansion among the three cohorts [Fig. 1(c)]. By comparison, upon postmortem inspection of the vessels in situ, the intermediate expansion and absence of a false lumen in the AngII No AAA cohort were not apparent.
We also investigated the differences in the diameter and vessel strain among the three cohorts. Based on time-averaged inner diameter values, we noted larger differences between peak systole and end diastole in the AngII No AAA and Saline cohorts as compared to the AngII AAA cohort [Fig. 1(d)]. In the examples shown, the difference between the peak systolic and end diastolic inner diameter was 52 μm (AngII AAA), 82 μm (AngII No AAA), and 144 μm (Saline). As with the volume/length, the average effective maximum diameter (EMD) was significantly different among all three cohorts [Fig. 1(e)]. The average EMD was 35.5% ± 3.2% larger for the AngII AAA cohort relative to the AngII No AAA cohort (p < 0.001). Relative to the Saline cohort, average EMD was 58.1% ± 5.1% larger for the AngII AAA cohort (p < 0.001) and 16.7% ± 1.4% larger for the AngII No AAA cohort (p < 0.05). The smallest EMD measurement for the AngII No AAA cohort (1.34 mm) was the same as the largest measurement for the Saline cohort, and not surprisingly, these two cohorts had the closest ranges of values. Average circumferential cyclic strain (CCS) values were significantly different among all three cohorts (AngII AAA: 3.07% ± 1.68%; AngII No AAA: 7.63% ± 2.89%; Saline: 14.42% ± 3.19%) [Fig. 1(f)]. For the AngII AAA cohort, average CCS was 78.7% ± 46.4% lower relative to the Saline cohort (p < 0.001). For the AngII No AAA cohort, average CCS was reduced (−47.1% ± 20.7%; p < 0.05) compared to the Saline cohort and was 59.8 ± 39.8% higher (p < 0.05) than that for the AngII AAA cohort. The individual strain values for the AngII No AAA cohort fall in the range of values of 4.5%–11.3% which overlaps with values from the other two cohorts. Furthermore, we found CCS to be inversely correlated with EMD (linear regression with a slope of −13.11 and a Pearson correlation coefficient of −0.82). However, for larger diameter aortas, some strain values were outside of the 95% confidence interval [Fig. 1(g)].
Inflammation- and extracellular matrix-related genes are differentially expressed among experimental cohorts
We found 346 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) to be significant for at least one of the experimental contrasts in the suprarenal aorta dataset. We applied two lines of evidence for DEG selection: (1) genes with a fold change of greater than 1.5 and (2) an adjusted p-value (false discovery rate) of less than 0.1. The highest number of unique DEGs (183) was found for the comparison with the highest expected contrast (AngII AAA vs. Saline) and the lowest number (16). for the comparison with the lowest expected contrast [AngII No AAA vs. saline; Fig. 2(a)]. These genes displayed three obvious patterns of expression across the experimental contrasts [Fig. 2(b)]. The first pattern (approximately 87% of DEGs) showed upregulated expression in the AngII AAA cohort, downregulated or no change in expression in the AngII No AAA cohort, and downregulated expression in the Saline cohort. The second pattern (8% of DEGs) showed downregulation for the AngII AAA cohort, little to no change in expression for the AngII No AAA cohort, and upregulation for the Saline cohort. Finally, the third pattern (5% of DEGs) showed little to no change in expression for the AngII AAA cohort, upregulation for the AngII No AAA cohort, and downregulation for the Saline cohort.
Of the three possible comparisons, we focused in particular on AngII AAA vs. AngII No AAA. Among the most upregulated genes (Table II) were primarily ones encoding for inflammatory factors and receptors (e.g., Il1r2, Csf3r, Ccl2, Pf4, and Ccr1) and matrix metalloproteinases (Mmp8 and Mmp9). We also measured upregulation of an inflammation-related microRNA (mir223). Among the most downregulated genes (Table III) were ones encoding extracellular matrix proteins (e.g., Optc, Col4a3, Eln, Mfap4, and Fmod), cytoskeletal proteins (e.g., Tnnt2 and Cnn1), as well as both a peptidase inhibitor (Serpina1d) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (Adamts8). Not surprisingly then, several genes relevant to inflammation and extracellular matrix remodeling are differentially expressed in the AngII AAA cohort. A list of all DEGs with fold change values is provided in the supplementary material, Table II. We verified the differential expression levels of selected DEGs by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) [Fig. 2(c)]. These genes followed the same pattern of expression as seen with RNA-seq analysis. mir223 was significantly upregulated in the AngII AAA cohort relative to each of the other cohorts, while Il1b was significantly upregulated in both the AngII and AngII No AAA cohorts. Eln was significantly downregulated for the AngII AAA cohort relative to the AngII No AAA cohort, but significantly upregulated for the AngII No AAA cohort relative to the Saline cohort. For the AngII AAA cohort, Col4a3 had a significantly lower level of expression relative to each of the other cohorts, which was opposite to Mmp9 expression levels.
TABLE II.
Top 30 upregulated genes (AngII AAA vs. AngII No AAA) | ||
---|---|---|
Gene name | Full name | log2 (fold change) |
Hsd3b1 | Hydroxy-delta-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3 beta- and steroid delta-isomerase 1 | 6.03 |
Cyp21a1 | Cytochrome P450, family 21, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 | 5.23 |
Il1r2 | Interleukin 1 receptor, type II | 5.05 |
S100a8 | S100 calcium binding protein A8 (calgranulin A) | 4.94 |
S100a9 | S100 calcium binding protein A9 (calgranulin B) | 4.85 |
Arg1 | Arginase 1 | 4.85 |
Cyp11a1 | Cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 | 4.77 |
Chil3 | Chitinase-like 3 | 4.73 |
Ppbp | Pro-platelet basic protein; | 4.73 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 7 | ||
Csf3r | Colony stimulating factor 3 receptor | 4.60 |
Cyp11b1 | Cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily b, polypeptide 1 | 4.52 |
Mmp8 | Matrix metalloproteinase 8 | 4.42 |
Neutrophil collagenase | ||
Akr1b7 | Aldo-keto reductase family 1, member B7 | 4.42 |
Star | Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein | 4.33 |
Ccl2 | Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 | 4.21 |
Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 | ||
Slfn4 | Schlafen 4 | 4.16 |
Clec4d | C-type lectin domain family 4, member d | 4.12 |
Pf4 | Platelet factor 4 | 4.09 |
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 4 | ||
Hmox1 | Heme oxygenase 1 | 4.07 |
Spp1 | Secreted phosphoprotein 1 | 3.99 |
Osteopontin | ||
Cxcl5 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 5 | 3.99 |
Mmp9 | Matrix metalloproteinase 9 | 3.97 |
Cxcr2 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2 | 3.93 |
Interleukin 8 receptor, alpha | ||
F630028O10Rik,Mir223 | RIKEN cDNA F630028O10 gene miR-223 | 3.88 |
Nrgn | Neurogranin | 3.70 |
Pram1 | PML-RAR alpha-regulated adaptor molecule 1 | 3.65 |
Clec4n | C-type lectin domain family 4, member n | 3.64 |
Dectin-2 | ||
Ccr1 | Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 1 | 3.62 |
Cxcl2 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2 | 3.61 |
Ifitm1 | Interferon induced transmembrane protein 1 | 3.59 |
TABLE III.
Top 30 downregulated genes (AngII AAA vs AngII No AAA) | ||
---|---|---|
Gene name | Full name | log2 (fold change) |
Sost | Sclerostin | −3.98 |
Tnnt2 | Troponin T2, cardiac | −3.97 |
1700003D09Rik | RIKEN cDNA 1700003D09 gene | −3.14 |
Optc | Opticin | −2.93 |
Pgbd1 | piggyBac transposable element derived 1 | −2.73 |
Serpina1d | Serine (or cysteine) peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 1D | −2.69 |
Igfbp2 | Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 | −2.64 |
Casq1 | Calsequestrin 1 | −2.56 |
Lhx9 | LIM homeobox protein 9 | −2.49 |
Samd7 | Sterile alpha motif domain containing 7 | −2.45 |
Drd1 | Dopamine receptor D1 | −2.44 |
9330102E08Rik | RIKEN cDNA 9330102E08 gene | −2.38 |
Pnoc | Prepronociceptin | −2.29 |
Col4a3 | Collagen, type IV, alpha 3 | −2.27 |
Vax2os | Ventral anterior homeobox 2, opposite strand | −2.27 |
Cnn1 | Calponin 1 | −2.26 |
Eln | Elastin | −2.24 |
Mfap4 | Microfibrillar-associated protein 4 | −2.20 |
Rp1l1 | Retinitis pigmentosa 1 homolog like 1 | −2.14 |
Clec3b | C-type lectin domain family 3, member b | −2.12 |
Fmod | Fibromodulin | −2.11 |
Adamts8 | A disintegrin-like and metallopeptidase (reprolysin type) with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 8 | −2.10 |
Chmp4c | Charged multivesicular body protein 4C | −2.07 |
Trim71 | Tripartite motif-containing 71 | −2.06 |
Ccdc141 | Coiled-coil domain containing 141 | −2.05 |
Itgbl1 | Integrin, beta-like 1 | −2.05 |
Adamtsl2 | ADAMTS-like 2 | −2.03 |
Nov | CCN3 Nephroblastoma overexpressed gene | −1.98 |
Dusp27 | Dual specificity phosphatase 27 (putative) Gm209 | −1.96 |
Susd5 | Sushi domain containing 5 | −1.95 |
A subset of DEGs related to inflammation and extracellular matrix remodeling shows differential expression in the suprarenal aorta
We focused the list of DEGs further by excluding genes with differential expression in the infrarenal aortas of the same animals. Forty-five of the 346 genes had no differential expression in the infrarenal aortas from the AngII AAA cohort (supplementary material, Table II, second tab). Of these genes, 8 were upregulated and 1 was downregulated relative to the AngII No AAA cohort. Genes that encode for a member of a lymphocyte differentiation antigen superfamily expressed on neutrophils (Ly6g6d), a plasma membrane efflux pump (Abcb1b), and a proteoglycan involved in protease storage in hematopoietic cells (Srgn) were all upregulated. Il1rn, which encodes for the IL-1 receptor antagonist, was also upregulated. Sost, a gene that encodes for a Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitor, was downregulated.
Relative to the Saline cohort, 34 genes associated with multiple processes were upregulated, including inflammation (e.g., Pf4, Mpeg1, and Tnfrsf1b), reactive oxygen species production (Cybb), blood pressure regulation (Ednrb), thrombus formation (F13a1 and Emilin2), extracellular matrix remodeling (e.g., Mmp14, Adam12, and Col8a1), and leukocyte recruitment (Gcnt1). Lrg1, a gene encoding a member of the leucine-rich repeat family of proteins, was upregulated and is a potential pathological biomarker. Individual genes associated with second messenger production (Adcy5), connective tissue assembly (Thsd4), immune homeostasis (Cytl1), and smooth muscle cell function (Synpo2) were downregulated.
Ten of the 346 genes had no differential expression in the infrarenal aortas from the AngII No AAA cohort. Eight genes were upregulated relative to the Saline cohort, such as Sst, which encodes for a hormone with immunosuppressive and antiproliferative effects. Other genes were not well annotated or have no supporting evidence to date for aortic expression. Relative to the AngII AAA cohort, Ly6g6d and Hsd3b1 were downregulated.
Suprarenal aorta Il1b expression is associated with the aortic size and strain
We analyzed the association between aortic gene expression and US-derived metrics of size (EMD and volume/length) and strain (CCS). As these metrics are related to the vessel structure and pulsatility, we first evaluated the relationship to expression levels of Mmp9, which can cleave elastin, collagen, and other proteins [Fig. 2(d)]. For 5 of the 7 AngII AAA animals, lower ΔCT values (i.e., higher relative expression) of Mmp9 were associated with larger EMD and lower CCS. For AngII No AAA and Saline animals, higher ΔCT values were associated with lower EMD and higher CCS. Overall, regression lines showed good correlation (Pearson correlation coefficients of −0.89, −0.94, and 0.86 for EMD, Volume/Length, and CCS, respectively). Mmp9 expression levels, however, overlapped for the AngII No AAA and Saline cohorts.
We then evaluated the relationship to Il1b, which had a wider range of expression values [Fig. 2(e)]. Intermediate ΔCT values of Il1b for the AngII No AAA animals were also associated with moderate vessel expansion and strain reduction. Regression lines again showed good correlation (Pearson correlation coefficients: −0.94, −0.92, and 0.87).
Regulation of neutrophil migration, neutrophil chemotaxis, monocyte chemotaxis, blood coagulation, and cellular extravasation are enriched in dissecting AAAs
The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) system calculated high enrichment scores for the AngII AAA cohort in functional annotation clusters related to the immune system, chemokines, and secreted and extracellular factors. Relative to the Saline cohort, high enrichment scores for the AngII No AAA cohort included functional annotation clusters related to secreted and extracellular factors, the extracellular matrix, immune system processes, and collagen.
Statistical ranking of gene ontology (GO) terms for biological processes revealed that multiple inflammatory processes were highly enriched in the AngII AAA cohort compared to both the AngII No AAA and Saline cohorts (Fig. 3). Interestingly, multiple GO terms identified regulation of neutrophils as a significant biological process. Furthermore, GO terms for cytokine production, mononuclear cell migration, and monocyte chemotaxis were enriched, supporting the expected presence and recruitment of monocytes/macrophages. In line with US findings and necropsy images of thrombus in all dissecting AAAs, processes for blood coagulation were also enriched. Collagen metabolism and cellular extravasation were uniquely enriched in the AngII AAA cohort as compared to the AngII No AAA cohort. The AngII No AAA cohort was uniquely enriched for processes including muscle contraction and wound healing. A complete list of all significant GO terms for biological processes as well as molecular functions across the three comparisons is provided in the supplementary material, Table III. GO term analysis with the subset of 45 suprarenal-specific AngII AAA DEGs produced a shorter list of biological processes that included regulation of Rho-dependent protein serine/threonine kinase activity (GO:2000298), positive regulation of tumor necrosis factor production (GO:0032760), inflammatory response (GO:0006954), and immune response (GO:0006955).
Comparative analysis of differentially expressed genes after acute and chronic AngII infusion
We compared DEGs in the present study with those identified in a chronic (28-day) AngII infusion study (GEO accession # GSE12591).24 Forty-four DEGs were found to be unique to the present study, including factors involved in inflammation (e.g., Ccl6, Ccr2, and Arg1), reactive oxygen species generation (e.g., Ncf1 and Lyz2), and regulation of transcription (Spi1) (supplementary material, Table IV and Fig. 2). AngII has been shown to stimulate oxidative stress, which is proposed to be a driver for dissecting AAA development.23,25 We measured upregulated expression of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAPHD) oxidase subunit p47phox (Ncf1)26 and lysozyme M (Lyz2)27 in the AngII AAA cohort. Other DEGs from this list have yet to be studied in the context of aortic disease but are relevant to neutrophil biology. Serglycin (Srgn) is a proteoglycan required for granule storage of neutrophil elastase,28 and PRAM-1 (Pram1) is an adaptor molecule expressed mostly in mouse neutrophils which is necessary for reactive oxygen species production.29 Several DEGs found from our comparative analysis to the chronic AngII infusion study therefore include potential early therapeutic targets.
Histology and immunohistochemistry
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Movat's Pentachrome (MOV), and Martius, Scarlet and Blue (MSB) staining revealed focal elastin breakage, a moderate number of inflammatory cells, and fibrin in the suprarenal aortas of the AngII AAA cohort (Fig. 4). For one mouse, we confirmed that a dissecting AAA extended distal to the renal arteries. Suprarenal aortas from the AngII No AAA cohort did not have evidence of aortic dissection or aneurysm formation with the possible exception of one tissue showing separation of the adventitia from media and the presence of eosinophilic fibrillar material. However, this could be due to a tissue processing artifact as no dissection was observed by US or after euthanasia. Interestingly, tissues from the AngII AAA and AngII No AAA cohorts exhibited minimal adventitial collagen as compared to the Saline cohort (MOV and MSB in Fig. 4). The infrarenal aortas from the AngII AAA cohort had abundant adventitial collagen in three of the seven tissues.
MMP-9 was abundant throughout the vessel wall for the AngII AAA cohort. Relative to the AngII No AAA cohort, MMP-9 percent immunolabeling was 5-fold greater on average (p = 0.0071; Fig. 5). MMP-9 in the infrarenal aortas from the AngII AAA cohort was weak and non-specific, and for the Saline cohort, it had low intensity. IL-1β was less abundant in general and more sparsely distributed. For the AngII AAA cohort, IL-1β immunolabeling was variable with five of the seven dissecting AAAs having intense labeling that tapers away from the wall into the dissected region. The other two tissues had minimal labeling at all; however, in all seven tissues, we observed MMP-9 and IL-1β along the media/dissected region interface. For the AngII No AAA cohort, staining intensity and abundance of IL-1β were low except for the tissue with an apparent aneurysm where all the positive staining resided. IL-1β immunolabeling had low intensity and abundance and was largely confined to the adventitia for the Saline cohort and the infrarenal aortas from the AngII AAA cohort.
The adventitia of the aortas in the AngII AAA and AngII No AAA cohorts contained moderate numbers of mixed inflammatory cells, most notably neutrophils and macrophages (H&E in Fig. 4; Ly6G and F4/80 in Fig. 5), as well as lymphocytes and few plasma cells. For neutrophils in the AngII AAA cohort, we quantified 6-fold greater percent immunolabeling on average (p = 0.017) throughout the vessel wall including the dissected region (Fig. 5). Macrophages had similar percent immunolabeling in both cohorts. The adventitia of the aortas from the Saline cohort contained inflammatory cells within normal limits. The inflammatory cells in the adventitia of the infrarenal aortas from the AngII AAA cohort were within normal limits except for the sample with a distally extending aneurysm and a tissue with mildly increased levels.
DISCUSSION
We investigated the early pathology of dissecting AAAs by differentiating the morphological, biomechanical, microstructural, and inflammatory changes occurring in mice with and without suprarenal aortic dissection. We found that AngII exposure led to aortic vessel expansion and a reduction in vessel wall CCS. Neutrophil and mononuclear cell infiltration, IL-1β expression, and medial and adventitial ECM remodeling occurred to varying degrees dependent on whether an aortic dissection was identified in vivo. Below, we further discuss tissue- and gene-level differences identified in the AngII AAA and AngII No AAA cohorts.
Aortic expansion and vessel wall pulsatility in the AngII No AAA cohort
Aortic vessel expansion and reduction in CCS occurred in all AngII-infused animals regardless of whether a dissecting AAA formed. This result was surprising for the AngII No AAA cohort because significant changes in the EMD or volume/length were not expected in the absence of a dissection. We attribute the increase in the EMD (42% ± 4%) and volume/length (67% ± 16%) in this cohort to the hypertensive effect of AngII on aortic remodeling.30 The percent increase in EMD was below a 50% threshold, the current clinical metric used to define human AAAs, for four of the five AngII No AAA murine aortas. Geometric measurements from the in vivo US data suggest that there is moderate vessel enlargement, especially after 10 days of AngII infusion. Despite the uniform lengths used for volumetric segmentation in this cohort, the percent increase for volume/length values ranged between 30% and 109%.
Endpoint CCS was less than 10% for three of the five animals in the AngII No AAA cohort (4.5%, 6.4%, and 8.3%) and overlapped with animals in the other two cohorts. Future work could include acquisition of 4D US data to analyze global and region-specific vessel wall strain in these aortas.31 This more sophisticated analysis would provide insight into where along the suprarenal aorta of AngII-infused animals we detect the largest reductions in pulsatility. During daily screening of AngII-infused animals, we collected M-mode data to assess whether average CCS was reduced. We performed measurements at three different axial locations along the suprarenal aorta but did not identify abnormally low CCS in any animals prior to the development of dissecting AAAs. Using 4D image analysis for this purpose however may have better predictive capability by correlating regional strain heterogeneity with potential for focal medial elastin breakage, dissection, and aortic expansion.
Aortic gene expression of matrix remodeling enzymes and extracellular matrix proteins
We found high levels of suprarenal MMP expression, including Mmp8 and Mmp9, in the AngII AAA cohort. MMP-8, expressed in neutrophils as well as endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, and macrophages, cleaves native type I and type III fibrillar collagens.32–34 Mmp8 expression could be indicative of the presence of infiltrating neutrophils35 or synthesis by adventitial mesenchymal cells.36 Wilson et al. have shown that MMP-8 activity is significantly higher in areas where aortic rupture has occurred in human AAAs,37 supporting the theory that its specificity towards proteolysis-resistant fibrillar collagens is necessary for excess collagen breakdown and eventual rupture.38
There is clearly a significant role of MMP-9 in aortic disease initiation. Based on the finding of high circulating levels of MMP-9 in patients with acute aortic dissection, Kurihara et al. determined that AngII induced the release of MMP-9 from neutrophils, which led to acute aortic dissection in the thoracic aorta of mice that were administered a lysyl oxidase inhibitor.39 We verified in the present study that the highest intensity and abundance of MMP-9 were found in AngII AAA tissues (Fig. 5). Strong adventitial staining is observed and is codistributed with both F4/80+ macrophages and Ly6G+ neutrophils. Future work could include colocalization analysis of these markers and investigation of whether MMP-9, beyond its role in elastin degradation,40 is sufficient to activate IL-1β during initial aortic expansion.41
Interestingly, Eln expression was highest in the AngII No AAA cohort. We also measured differential expression of elastin-associated ECM proteins, such as Fbn1 and Mfap5, suggesting ongoing vessel wall remodeling or repair processes involving elastin microfibril assembly.42 For AngII No AAA tissues, we observed intermittent and small microstructural defects to the elastin. One tissue did have two small transmural ruptures on the proximal end of the suprarenal aorta. While further work is needed, this initial analysis suggests that increased Eln expression may be protective against AngII-induced dissections.
Various collagen types showed differential expression and were classified based on related functions to other ECM and secreted factors. For the AngII AAA cohort, Col8a1 was significantly upregulated relative to the Saline cohort and was functionally classified (i.e., shared multiple annotation terms in common) with genes encoding for complement pathway factors C1q43 and C1qtnf644 as well as Emilin2 (elastin microfibril interfacer 2).45 Increased local synthesis of EMILIN2 may be occurring in dissecting AAA formation; its proposed role in thrombus formation and contraction would be of interest to explore.45 We also noted downregulation of Fmod, which encodes a fibrosis-promoting collagen-associated protein, fibromodulin. Dense collagen formation is increased by fibromodulin, which promotes collagen cross-linking activity.46 This finding agrees with our histology which revealed only a thin layer of adventitial collagen in the AngII AAA tissues. Indeed, compensatory collagen deposition and remodeling may not be present at this early stage (cf. to Refs. 19 and 20).
Inflammatory gene expression signatures
GO terms for inflammatory cell recruitment and regulation predominated for the AngII AAA cohort. Inflammation-resolving processes (e.g., wound healing and negative regulation of cytokine production) were identified for both the AngII AAA and AngII No AAA cohorts. We measured high expression levels of Il1b in AngII-infused animals with the largest difference for the AngII AAA cohort relative to the Saline cohort (∼60-fold increase; p < 0.001). Nlrp3, which encodes for a sensor protein that is part of the inflammasome complex, was significantly upregulated relative to the AngII No AAA cohort as was the signaling receptor for IL-1β (Il1r1) relative to the Saline cohort. Relative to the AngII No AAA cohort, however, higher expression of some factors involved in blunting IL-1-mediated inflammation (Il1r2 and Il1rn) suggests that a more complex picture is at a play within this early stage.
Martin et al. demonstrated that IL-1R2, a decoy signaling receptor for IL-1, is constitutively expressed on mouse neutrophils, and after an inflammatory stimulus, it can be shed from the membrane and then re-expressed.47 Thus, a soluble form of this receptor is able to sequester free IL-1. IL-1 receptor antagonist, encoded by Il1rn (IL-1Ra), is required in excess of IL-1β in order to inhibit IL-1-induced processes and is secreted by the same cells producing IL-1β.48,49 Il1rn was found to be a DEG in the AngII AAA suprarenal dataset that was absent in the infrarenal dataset, suggesting that a counterbalancing inflammatory response may be active in the suprarenal aorta. Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) canonical pathway analysis for the AngII AAA vs. Saline comparison identified the “inflammasome pathway” as activated (z-score 2.236; p = 0.0035) similar to what we calculated using the publicly available results from the chronic (28-day) AngII infusion study24 (z-score 2; p = 0.0164). “IL-1 signaling” had borderline activation (z-score 1.897; p = 0.0012) based on differential expression of Il1r1, Myd88, Fos, Ikbke, Irak3, Nfkbia, Gnai3, and Adcy5 and is more significant as compared to the chronic study (z-score 1.342; p = 0.321). IL-1β immunolabeling had similar overall abundance in the AngII AAA and AngII No AAA cohorts; however, higher intensity in particular along the edge of the dissected regions was seen in the dissecting AAAs (Fig. 5). Taken together, these data suggest that the AngII AAA cohort shows upregulated expression of factors involved in the inflammasome pathway and IL-1β signaling and that IL-1β inhibition or sequestration may also be active.
Neutrophils and macrophages are the inflammatory cell types we found to show high and consistent enrichment in the AngII AAA cohort. A neutrophil marker (Ly6g6d) was a DEG in the suprarenal dataset that was absent in the infrarenal dataset. Other granulocyte markers (e.g., Csf3r) and factors promoting neutrophil chemotaxis (e.g., Pf4 and Cxcl2)50,51 were also differentially expressed relative to the other two cohorts. IPA identified “fMLP signaling in neutrophils” (12 genes; z-score 3.464; p = 2.36E-4) and “infiltration of neutrophils” (45 genes; z-score 3.015; p = 1.2E-25) as activated for the AngII AAA vs. AngII No AAA comparison. These processes had lower activation z-scores for the chronic study (z-scores 1.89 and 1.358, respectively). Activation of N-formylmethionine leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) signaling in neutrophils raises the possibility that mitochondrial chemotactic peptides released upon cell injury and necrosis52 are responsible for neutrophil recruitment in the suprarenal aorta and subsequent pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory effects.53 Ly6G+ neutrophils were abundant throughout the adventitia and dissected region of AngII AAA tissues, similar to the distribution for the AngII No AAA tissues but which had less positive immunolabeling (Fig. 5). We also noted pervasive immunolabeling in the periadventitial space, which was excluded from analysis. Thus, gene- and tissue-level results indicate that neutrophil recruitment and infiltration are particularly active in the suprarenal aorta following acute AngII infusion. Laroumanie et al. found similar results after acute AngII infusion in a non-hyperlipidemic knockout model.54 For the present study, whether neutrophils are involved in dissection formation and/or subsequent vessel remodeling within the dissecting AAA is not clear.
Key chemokines and chemokine receptors on monocytes/macrophages showed high expression (e.g., Ccl2, Ccr1, and Ccr2) in the AngII AAA cohort. “Production of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in macrophages” (z-score 2.985; p = 4.28E-10), “Fcγ receptor-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages and monocytes” (z-score 4.082; p = 1.25E-16), and “CCR5 signaling in macrophages” (z-score 2.236; p = 0.0202) were all found to be significantly activated for the AngII AAA vs. AngII No AAA comparison in the suprarenal dataset. For the infrarenal dataset, only “Fcγ receptor-mediated phagocytosis in macrophages and monocytes” was found to have borderline activation (z-score 2; p = 0.0571). These three pathways showed very similar activation z-scores (3.051, 3.606, and 2.236, respectively) for the chronic infusion study. Total (F4/80+) macrophage immunolabeling on AngII AAA tissues was abundant throughout the adventitia and sparsely distributed in the dissected region (Fig. 5). These results confirm previous studies12,21,27,55 that macrophages are an active inflammatory cell type in the suprarenal aorta and underscore their involvement in early dissecting AAA development.
Potential disease regulator biomarkers and therapeutic targets
Among the highest expressed DEGs in the AngII AAA cohort was mir223 (∼7-fold average increase relative to the AngII No AAA cohort; p = 0.0023), a micro-RNA which is released possibly exclusively by hematopoietic cells.56 This micro-RNA is a potential biomarker and therapeutic target, requiring further investigation in light of recent publications on multiple inflammatory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease57 and cancer.58 Chu et al. recently proposed a mechanism for how miR-223 may be released from leukocytes and platelets into circulation and lead to vascular injury that causes Kawasaki Disease, a genetic condition associated with increased systemic vascular inflammation that can cause coronary artery aneurysms.56 Kin et al. have shown that relative to healthy patients, higher mir223 expression is detectable in human AAA tissue and accompanied by lower expression in AAA patients' plasma.59
The most downregulated DEG in the AngII AAA cohort (Sost; ∼15-fold average decrease relative to the AngII No AAA cohort; p = 5 × 10−5) had no differential expression in the infrarenal dataset. Sost encodes sclerostin,60 a secreted glycoprotein that can inhibit Wnt signaling, leading to decreased expression of osteopontin (Spp1), MMP-2, and MMP-9 (61). Our findings of significant downregulation of Sost accompanied by upregulated Spp1 and Mmp9 are in line with the study by Krishna et al. which demonstrated the potential of sclerostin in inhibiting dissecting AAA formation and atherosclerosis and provided evidence for epigenetic silencing of sclerostin in human AAAs.61
A secreted glycoprotein found in serum that is thought to be involved in differentiation of neutrophils (leucine-rich α2-glycoprotein, LRG)62 showed upregulated gene expression in both the AngII AAA and AngII No AAA cohorts relative to the Saline cohort (∼5.5- and 3-fold increase, respectively). Previous studies63,64 have proposed that LRG could be used as a circulating biomarker for inflammatory states. It would be of interest to validate whether LRG has higher circulating levels in animals that do develop a dissecting AAA.
STUDY LIMITATIONS
Our study has several limitations that are important to note. While we did not visualize the thoracic aorta as part of the imaging protocol, AngII-induced dissections can also arise in this region.65 Therefore, it is possible that we overlooked focal dissections developing in the thoracic aorta of AngII-infused animals. However, we observed no thoracic aortic dissections after euthanasia and restricted our collection of aortic tissue to the abdominal aorta rather than the entire aortic tree, which would minimize the influence of any undetected pathological changes in the thoracic aorta. Furthermore, it is possible that minor microstructural defects led to moderate vessel expansion without false lumen formation in the suprarenal aorta.20,66 In this case, two-dimensional diameter measurements and one-dimensional vessel wall strain calculations would likely be inadequate to differentiate between a healthy and diseased suprarenal aorta. Indeed, as discussed above, this limitation underscores the importance of more sophisticated in vivo strain analysis in identifying diseased regions.31 Still, in vivo US imaging in the long- and short-axes of vessel wall pulsatility and blood flow dynamics, later confirmed by direct visualization after euthanasia, enabled us to correctly classify those animals with newly developed dissected aneurysmal lesions in the suprarenal aorta.
We chose to divide each aortic segment so that the tissue halves could be allocated for different types of experiments. The issue with this approach is that the proximal and distal regions of the suprarenal aorta have different properties. Our analysis of the disease-initiating effects is therefore more limited than it would be if we were to analyze both regions at the gene and tissue level. If, for example, a focal dissection arose adjacent to the right renal-mesenteric trifurcation, then the gene expression data could reflect the effects of dissection formation more so than the histology and immunohistochemistry results, which were analyzed on the proximal half of the aneurysmal lesion. A more advanced workflow that allows for RNA extraction from histology-prepped tissue, such as laser capture microdissection, could possibly circumvent this issue.
Finally, we designed this study to characterize how AngII differentially affects the suprarenal aorta of mice that have developed a dissecting AAA within the last 24 h as compared to those that did not develop one. What remains unclear to us is whether the effects we are measuring for the AngII AAA cohort are simply the response to injury or are also indicative of the disease initiation processes that may continue to be active in the midst of tissue healing and repair. Indeed, timing the collection of the tissue immediately before or after dissection formation would be very interesting for a future study. This, however, would be challenging as it would require an approach capable of predicting precisely when a dissection is likely to occur.
SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
We have quantitatively characterized the early pathology seen in AngII-infused apoE-/- mice through a comparison with animals that did not develop dissections and saline-infused controls. We found that the aorta expanded and had reduced vessel wall strain regardless of whether a dissecting AAA formed in AngII-infused mice. Biological processes related to neutrophil and mononuclear cell inflammation, regulation of IL-1β signaling, ECM remodeling, and blood coagulation were all enriched in the AngII AAA cohort. Processes such as muscle contraction and wound healing were enriched in the AngII No AAA cohort relative to saline controls alongside intermediate gene expression of proinflammatory and matrix remodeling genes. Histology revealed the presence of focal elastin breakage, accumulation of fibrin and red blood cells, and relatively little adventitial collagen in early stage dissecting AAAs. Furthermore, we observed that neutrophils are co-distributed with IL-1β and MMP-9. This work advances our understanding of the early development of this murine model and has potential translational significance for improving diagnosis and therapy options of acute aortic syndrome in humans.
METHODS
Experimental design
The Purdue Animal Care and Use Committee approved all experiments performed on the animal protocol (#130200818). We implanted 20 male apoE-/- C57BL/6J mice at 12 weeks of age with subcutaneous miniosmotic pumps (Alzet, DURECT Corp, Cupertino, CA) loaded with either AngII (n = 15) or saline (n = 5). AngII was loaded according to the animal body weight at a dose of 1000 ng/kg min for an infusion duration of 28 days. AngII-infused animals were monitored for dissecting AAA development by US for up to 10 days after pump implantation surgery. At the time of pump implantation (12 weeks of age), the AngII AAA cohort weighed 28.4 ± 1.7 g, the AngII No AAA cohort 27.5 ± 1.6 g, and the Saline cohort 28.8 ± 2.1 g. At the time of euthanizing (within 10 days after implantation), the AngII AAA cohort weighed 27.0 ± 1.4 g, the AngII No AAA cohort 26.7 ± 1.9 g, and the Saline cohort 29.5 ± 1.6 g. Individual weight fluctuations relative to the time of pump implantation did not vary by more than 10% over the study period.
In vivo ultrasound imaging and blood pressure collection
Before implanting pumps (baseline), we collected full US imaging datasets and systemic pressures. Starting at day 3 post-implantation, we screened the AngII-infused animals daily for the appearance of dissecting AAAs (Table I and supplementary material, Fig. 1). We acquired in vivo US data of aortic size (B-mode), pulsatility (M-mode), and blood flow dynamics (Color Doppler) using a 50 MHz center frequency transducer (MS700) on the Vevo2100 system (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Toronto, Canada). When screening an animal, if both short- and long-axis suprarenal aortic diameters were the same the previous day, we collected B-mode, M-mode, and Color Doppler scans and continued screening the following day. If the diameter was larger, we checked whether the aortic wall motion was substantially reduced (M-mode) and whether there was any disturbance in blood flow along the suprarenal aorta (Color Doppler). If a suprarenal aortic dissection was visible, we collected a full imaging dataset (2D and 3D B-mode, M-mode, Color Doppler, PW Doppler, and EKV) of the suprarenal aorta and euthanized the animal (supplementary material, Movie I). By day 10, if an aortic dissection was not observed, as would be evidenced by a substantial increase in the diameter alongside vessel stiffening and disturbance in blood flow, we collected a full imaging dataset and euthanized the animal (supplementary material, Movie I). For saline-infused mice, we collected imaging data at day 10 and then euthanized. US analysis (VEVO Lab, FUJIFILM VisualSonics) included EMD measurement, inner diameter measurement to calculate CCS, and 3D segmentation to measure the volume/length. We identified the location of maximum suprarenal aortic expansion seen in the short axis and measured the area bound by the outer aortic wall. From this value, we calculated EMD using the equation for the area of a circle. At the same location, we determined average peak systolic and average end diastolic inner diameters from M-mode data using a custom MATLAB script.67 With these values, we calculated Green-Lagrange circumferential cyclic strain, as described previously.14 With 3D B-mode scans, we segmented both the true lumen and the outer aortic wall. For the AngII AAA cohort, we segmented over the axial length of the dissecting AAA. Similarly for the AngII No AAA and Saline cohorts, we segmented 8 mm proximal to the right renal artery. We calculated volume/length values as the volume normalized to the segmentation length.
In addition to baseline assessment, we collected blood pressure measurements (CODA System, Kent Scientific, Torrington CT) from the tails of conscious animals between days 5 and 9. Each reported value is the average of systolic blood pressure measurements recorded from at least 11 acceptable runs with measured flow of more than 4 μl/min.
Animal euthanasia and tissue collection
We euthanized animals within 24 h of each animal-specific endpoint. We harvested the suprarenal aorta (from just distal to the diaphragm to just distal to the right renal artery) and the infrarenal aorta (from just distal to the left renal artery to the iliac bifurcation). Each aortic segment was divided via axial cuts into approximately equal halves and then frozen for histology and gene expression analysis (see below). For animals without dissecting AAAs, we grossed approximately 8 mm of both the suprarenal and infrarenal aorta.
Total RNA extraction, dilution, and pooling
Total RNA from the distal half of each aortic segment was extracted with TRIzol reagent and treated with DNase I prior to elution from spin columns using the Zymo Directzol RNA Miniprep kit and the RCC-5 columns. One μL of RNase inhibitor was added to each extracted sample. We verified sample quality by absorbance (Nanodrop, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). We purified samples with suspected DNA or protein contamination using RNA Clean and Concentrator-5 kit (Zymo, Irvine, CA). For inclusion in cDNA library construction and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays, biological samples were required to have 260/230 and 260/280 absorbance ratios of greater than 1.7. We used fluorimetry (Qubit 2.0, Thermo Scientific) to determine sample concentrations.
Prior to cDNA library construction, we made 6 experimental pools, each consisting of either suprarenal (n = 3–7) or infrarenal (n = 2–5) aortic segments from one of the three cohorts. A given pool was comprised of samples with equal amounts of total RNA. Absorbance readings were taken after dilution and pooling, and clean-up was performed if necessary.
cDNA library construction, purification, and quantification
We used the Ovation RNA-Seq System for mouse (NuGEN, San Carlos CA) designed for low input (10–100 ng) total RNA. Optional DNA fragmentation and concentration were not performed, but the libraries were depleted of ribosomal RNA using insert dependent adaptor cleavage (InDA-C) primers. We qualitatively assessed the amplified libraries using the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. If unreacted adapters or adapter dimers were present, we used Ampure beads to purify. Absolute size-adjusted concentrations for the libraries (8.2–87 nM) were determined using the KAPA Library Quantification Kit (KAPA Biosystems) and average library sizes from the electropherograms.
RNA sequencing and bioinformatics
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed at the Purdue University Genomics Core Facility. Samples were equally pooled and clustered on an Illumina Rapid Chemistry flow cell. One and a half lanes were loaded, and samples were sequenced in single-read mode for 61 base reads on an Illumina HiSeq2500. The total number of reads per library was between 33.8 and 42.4 million.
We performed subsequent expression analysis on Galaxy (usegalaxy.org). RNA-seq reads were quality-filtered with FastQC, aligned with HISAT2, and assembled using the Cufflinks protocol.68 The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE123874 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE123874). We first performed bioinformatics analysis for DEGs and GO terms using Advaita Bio's iPathwayGuide (http://www.advaitabio.com/ipathwayguide). This software analysis tool implements the “Impact Analysis” approach that takes into consideration the direction and type of all signals on a pathway, the position, role, and type of every gene, etc., as described by Draghici et al.69 We also used Qiagen Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) to generate networks and functional analyses (https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis/) for the 6 datasets as well as for publicly available data published by Rush et al.24 (data accessible at NCBI GEO database, accession GSE12591). We utilized DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery; https://david.ncifcrf.gov) to cluster genes by similar functional annotations collected from multiple sources, including GO terms, and to calculate an enrichment score for each functional annotation cluster.70,71
Real-time PCR and relative gene expression analysis
Remaining total RNA was first reverse-transcribed to cDNA (Applied Biosystems High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit, Waltham MA). We used ZEN double-quenched probes with fluorescein (6'-FAM) dye (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) to assay mir223, Il1b, Eln, Col4a3, Mmp9, and Ppia. We ran assays in duplicate using 0.5 ng of DNA template with the following cycling conditions: (1) 95 °C for 3 min; (2) 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min (Applied Biosystems 7500 System). After validating constitutive expression of Ppia across experimental conditions, we selected it as a housekeeping gene for normalizing target gene expression levels. We performed relative quantitation of gene expression (n = 3–7 per cohort) by the ΔΔCT method and used either the AngII No AAA or Saline cohort as a comparator group.
Histology and immunohistochemistry
We embedded the proximal halves of suprarenal and infrarenal segments in optical cutting temperature (OCT) compound and froze the tissues over dry ice-cooled isopentane prior to storage at −80 °C. For each slide, 5 μm-thick non-sequential cryosections (200 μm apart) were collected starting from the distal end of each segment. Sections were fixed with methanol and stained using H&E, MOV, and MSB. Standard IHC was performed using the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-mouse MMP-9 (ab38898; Abcam), goat anti-mouse IL-1β (AF401NA; R&D systems), rat anti-mouse neutrophil NIMP-R14 (ab2557; Abcam), and rat anti-mouse macrophage F4/80 (Cl:A3–1; Bio-Rad). Sections were developed using peroxidase substrate 3,3′diaminobenzidine (DAB), producing a brown stain in areas with immunoreactivity. Immunolabeling was quantified using marker-specific algorithms tuned by a pathologist to identify pixels with medium and strong DAB staining. We drew annotations of the vessel wall and excluded the lumen and periadventitial region from the analyzed areas. Positive pixel counts were normalized to the analyzed area on each section.
Statistics
EMD and CCS values from each experimental cohort were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparisons and correlated. For statistical analysis of ΔCT values, we performed one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple comparisons. Percent stained area values were compared between the AngII AAA and AngII No AAA cohorts by unpaired t-tests.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to thank Drs. Jessica M. Ellis and Andrea S. Pereyra for consultation and assistance with Galaxy software; Dr. Phillip San Miguel, Paul E. Parker, and Viktoria Krasnyanskaya in the Purdue Genomics Core for technical support and performing QC and sequencing. We also gratefully acknowledge the expert technical assistance and consulting provided by Victor A. Bernal-Crespo and Gabrielle E. Shafer in the Purdue University Histology Research Laboratory, a core facility of the NIH-funded Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute.
American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant (14SDG18220010) to C.J.G.
References
- 1. Petrinec D., Liao S., Holmes D. R., Reilly J. M., Parks W. C., and Thompson R. W., “ Doxycycline inhibition of aneurysmal degeneration in an elastase-induced rat model of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Preservation of aortic elastin associated with suppressed production of 92 kD gelatinase,” J. Vasc. Surg. 23, 336–346 (1996). 10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70279-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Charolidi N., Pirianov G., Torsney E., Pearce S., Laing K., Nohturfft A., and Cockerill G. W., “ Pioglitazone identifies a new target for aneurysm treatment: Role of Egr1 in an experimental murine model of aortic aneurysm,” J. Vasc. Res. 52, 81–93 (2015). 10.1159/000430986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Baxter B. T., McGee G. S., Shively V. P., Drummond I. A., Dixit S. N., Yamauchi M., and Pearce W. H., “ Elastin content, cross-links, and mRNA in normal and aneurysmal human aorta,” J. Vasc. Surg. 16, 192–200 (1992). 10.1016/0741-5214(92)90107-J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wanhainen A., Mani K., and Golledge J., “ Surrogate markers of abdominal aortic aneurysm progression,” Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol. 36, 236–244 (2016). 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Daugherty A. and Cassis L., “ Chronic angiotensin II infusion promotes atherogenesis in low density lipoprotein receptor -/- mice,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 892, 108–118 (1999). 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb07789.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Daugherty A., Manning M. W., and Cassis L. A., “ Angiotensin II promotes atherosclerotic lesions and aneurysms in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice,” J. Clin. Invest. 105, 1605–1612 (2000). 10.1172/JCI7818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Corvera J. S., “ Acute aortic syndrome,” Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 5, 188–193 (2016). 10.21037/acs.2016.04.05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dobrin P. B. and Mrkvicka R., “ Failure of elastin or collagen as possible critical connective tissue alterations underlying aneurysmal dilatation,” Cardiovasc. Surg. 2, 484–488 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bersi M. R., Khosravi R., Wujciak A. J., Harrison D. G., and Humphrey J. D., “ Differential cell-matrix mechanoadaptations and inflammation drive regional propensities to aortic fibrosis, aneurysm or dissection in hypertension,” J. R. Soc. Interface 14, 20170327 (2017). 10.1098/rsif.2017.0327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bersi M. R., Bellini C., Wu J., Montaniel K. R. C., Harrison D. G., and Humphrey J. D., “ Excessive adventitial remodeling leads to early aortic maladaptation in angiotensin-induced hypertension,” Hypertension 67, 890–896 (2016). 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Botnar R. M., Wiethoff A. J., Ebersberger U., Lacerda S., Blume U., Warley A., Jansen C. H., Onthank D. C., Cesati R. R., Razavi R., Marber M. S., Hamm B., Schaeffter T., Robinson S. P., and Makowski M. R., “ In vivo assessment of aortic aneurysm wall integrity using elastin-specific molecular magnetic resonance imaging,” Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 7, 679–689 (2014). 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Saraff K., Babamusta F., Cassis L. A., and Daugherty A., “ Aortic dissection precedes formation of aneurysms and atherosclerosis in angiotensin II-infused, apolipoprotein E-deficient mice,” Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 23, 1621–1626 (2003). 10.1161/01.ATV.0000085631.76095.64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Trachet B., Aslanidou L., Piersigilli A., Fraga-Silva R. A., Sordet-Dessimoz J., Villanueva-Perez P., Stampanoni M. F. M., Stergiopulos N., and Segers P., “ Angiotensin II infusion into ApoE-/- mice: A model for aortic dissection rather than abdominal aortic aneurysm?,” Cardiovasc. Res. 113, 1230–1242 (2017). 10.1093/cvr/cvx128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Goergen C. J., Azuma J., Barr K. N., Magdefessel L., Kallop D. Y., Gogineni A., Grewall A., Weimer R. M., Connolly A. J., Dalman R. L., Taylor C. A., Tsao P. S., and Greve J. M., “ Influences of aortic motion and curvature on vessel expansion in murine experimental aneurysms,” Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 31, 270–279 (2011). 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.216481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Favreau J. T., Nguyen B. T., Gao I., Yu P., Tao M., Schneiderman J., Gaudette G. R., and Ozaki C. K., “ Murine ultrasound imaging for circumferential strain analyses in the angiotensin II abdominal aortic aneurysm model,” J. Vasc. Surg. 56, 462–469 (2012). 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Goergen C. J., Johnson B. L., Greve J. M., Taylor C. A., and Zarins C. K., “ Increased anterior abdominal aortic wall motion: Possible role in aneurysm pathogenesis and design of endovascular devices,” J. Endovasc. Ther. 14, 574–584 (2007). 10.1177/152660280701400421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Manning M. W., Cassi L. A., Huang J., Szilvassy S. J., and Daugherty A., “ Abdominal aortic aneurysms: Fresh insights from a novel animal model of the disease,” Vasc. Med. 7, 45–54 (2002). 10.1191/1358863x02vm413ra [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Trachet B., Fraga-Silva R. A., Jacquet P. A., Stergiopulos N., and Segers P., “ Incidence, severity, mortality, and confounding factors for dissecting AAA detection in angiotensin II-infused mice: A meta-analysis,” Cardiovasc. Res. 108, 159–170 (2015). 10.1093/cvr/cvv215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Phillips E. H., Yrineo A. A., Schroeder H. D., Wilson K. E., Cheng J. X., and Goergen C. J., “ Morphological and biomechanical differences in the elastase and AngII apoE(-/-) rodent models of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 413189. 10.1155/2015/413189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Phillips E. H., Di Achille P., Bersi M. R., Humphrey J. D., and Goergen C. J., “ Multi-modality imaging enables detailed hemodynamic simulations in dissecting aneurysms in mice,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 36, 1297–1305 (2017). 10.1109/TMI.2017.2664799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Rateri D. L., Howatt D. A., Moorleghen J. J., Charnigo R., Cassis L. A., and Daugherty A., “ Prolonged infusion of angiotensin II in apoE(-/-) mice promotes macrophage recruitment with continued expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Am. J. Pathol. 179, 1542–1548 (2011). 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Spin J. M., Hsu M., Azuma J., Tedesco M. M., Deng A., Dyer J. S., Maegdefessel L., Dalman R. L., and Tsao P. S., “ Transcriptional profiling and network analysis of the murine angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Physiol. Genomics 43, 993–1003 (2011). 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00044.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Usui F., Shirasuna K., Kimura H., Tatsumi K., Kawashima A., Karasawa T., Yoshimura K., Aoki H., Tsutsui H., Noda T., Sagara J., Taniguchi S., and Takahashi M., “ Inflammasome activation by mitochondrial oxidative stress in macrophages leads to the development of angiotensin II-induced aortic aneurysm,” Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol. 35, 127–136 (2015). 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rush C., Nyara M., Moxon J. V., Trollope A., Cullen B., and Golledge J., “ Whole genome expression analysis within the angiotensin II-apolipoprotein E deficient mouse model of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” BMC Genomics 10, 298 (2009). 10.1186/1471-2164-10-298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Thomas M., Gavrila D., McCormick M. L., F. J. Miller, Jr. , Daugherty A., Cassis L. A., Dellsperger K. C., and Weintraub N. L., “ Deletion of p47phox attenuates angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm formation in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice,” Circulation 114, 404–413 (2006). 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.607168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Siu K. L., Li Q., Zhang Y., Guo J., Youn J. Y., Du J., and Cai H., “ NOX isoforms in the development of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Redox Biol. 11, 118–125 (2017). 10.1016/j.redox.2016.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wenzel P., Knorr M., Kossmann S., Stratmann J., Hausding M., Schuhmacher S., Karbach S. H., Schwenk M., Yogev N., Schulz E., Oelze M., Grabbe S., Jonuleit H., Becker C., Daiber A., Waisman A., and Munzel T., “ Lysozyme M-positive monocytes mediate angiotensin II-induced arterial hypertension and vascular dysfunction,” Circulation 124, 1370–1381 (2011). 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.034470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Niemann C. U., Abrink M., Pejler G., Fischer R. L., Christensen E. I., Knight S. D., and Borregaard N., “ Neutrophil elastase depends on serglycin proteoglycan for localization in granules,” Blood 109, 4478–4486 (2007). 10.1182/blood-2006-02-001719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Clemens R. A., Newbrough S. A., Chung E. Y., Gheith S., Singer A. L., Koretzky G. A., and Peterson E. J., “ PRAM-1 is required for optimal integrin-dependent neutrophil function,” Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 10923–10932 (2004). 10.1128/MCB.24.24.10923-10932.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Phillips E. H., Chang M. S., Gorman S., Qureshi H. J., Ejendal K. F. K., Kinzer-Ursem T. L., Blaize A. N., and Goergen C. J., “ Angiotensin II infusion does not cause abdominal aortic aneurysms in apolipoprotein E-deficient rats,” J. Vasc. Res. 55, 1–12 (2018). 10.1159/000484086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cebull H. L., Soepriatna A. H., Boyle J. J., Rothenberger S. M., and Goergen C. J., “ Strain mapping from 4D ultrasound reveals complex remodeling in dissecting murine abdominal aortic aneurysms” (unpublished). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 32. Hasty K. A., Jeffrey J. J., Hibbs M. S., and Welgus H. G., “ The collagen substrate specificity of human neutrophil collagenase,” J. Biol. Chem. 262, 10048–10052 (1987). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Horwitz A. L., Hance A. J., and Crystal R. G., “ Granulocyte collagenase: Selective digestion of type I relative to type III collagen,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 897–901 (1977). 10.1073/pnas.74.3.897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Watanabe H., Nakanishi I., Yamashita K., Hayakawa T., and Okada Y., “ Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (92 kDa gelatinase/type IV collagenase) from U937 monoblastoid cells: Correlation with cellular invasion,” J. Cell Sci. 104(Pt 4), 991–999 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Eliason J. L., Hannawa K. K., Ailawadi G., Sinha I., Ford J. W., Deogracias M. P., Roelofs K. J., Woodrum D. T., Ennis T. L., Henke P. K., Stanley J. C., Thompson R. W., and G. R. Upchurch, Jr. , “ Neutrophil depletion inhibits experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm formation,” Circulation 112, 232–240 (2005). 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.517391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Wilson W. R., Schwalbe E. C., Jones J. L., Bell P. R., and Thompson M. M., “ Matrix metalloproteinase 8 (neutrophil collagenase) in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Br. J. Surg. 92, 828–833 (2005). 10.1002/bjs.4993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wilson W. R., Anderton M., Schwalbe E. C., Jones J. L., Furness P. N., Bell P. R., and Thompson M. M., “ Matrix metalloproteinase-8 and -9 are increased at the site of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture,” Circulation 113, 438–445 (2006). 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.551572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Abdul-Hussien H., Soekhoe R. G., Weber E., von der Thusen J. H., Kleemann R., Mulder A., van Bockel J. H., Hanemaaijer R., and Lindeman J. H., “ Collagen degradation in the abdominal aneurysm: A conspiracy of matrix metalloproteinase and cysteine collagenases,” Am. J. Pathol. 170, 809–817 (2007). 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kurihara T., Shimizu-Hirota R., Shimoda M., Adachi T., Shimizu H., Weiss S. J., Itoh H., Hori S., Aikawa N., and Okada Y., “ Neutrophil-derived matrix metalloproteinase 9 triggers acute aortic dissection,” Circulation 126, 3070–3080 (2012). 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Longo G. M., Xiong W., Greiner T. C., Zhao Y., Fiotti N., and Baxter B. T., “ Matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 work in concert to produce aortic aneurysms,” J. Clin. Invest. 110, 625–632 (2002). 10.1172/JCI0215334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Schonbeck U., Mach F., and Libby P., “ Generation of biologically active IL-1 beta by matrix metalloproteinases: A novel caspase-1-independent pathway of IL-1 beta processing,” J. Immunol. 161, 3340–3346 (1998). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Penner A. S., Rock M. J., Kielty C. M., and Shipley J. M., “ Microfibril-associated glycoprotein-2 interacts with fibrillin-1 and fibrillin-2 suggesting a role for MAGP-2 in elastic fiber assembly,” J. Biol. Chem. 277, 35044–35049 (2002). 10.1074/jbc.M206363200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Skoglund C., Wettero J., and Bengtsson T., “ C1q regulates collagen-dependent production of reactive oxygen species, aggregation and levels of soluble P-selectin in whole blood,” Immunol. Lett. 142, 28–33 (2012). 10.1016/j.imlet.2011.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lei X., Seldin M. M., Little H. C., Choy N., Klonisch T., and Wong G. W., “ C1q/TNF-related protein 6 (CTRP6) links obesity to adipose tissue inflammation and insulin resistance,” J. Biol. Chem. 292, 14836–14850 (2017). 10.1074/jbc.M116.766808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Huang M., Sannaningaiah D., Zhao N., Gong Y., Grondolsky J., and Hoover-Plow J., “ EMILIN2 regulates platelet activation, thrombus formation, and clot retraction,” PLoS One 10, e0115284 (2015). 10.1371/journal.pone.0115284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kalamajski S., Bihan D., Bonna A., Rubin K., and Farndale R. W., “ Fibromodulin interacts with collagen cross-linking sites and activates lysyl oxidase,” J. Biol. Chem. 291, 7951–7960 (2016). 10.1074/jbc.M115.693408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Martin P., Palmer G., Vigne S., Lamacchia C., Rodriguez E., Talabot-Ayer D., Rose-John S., Chalaris A., and Gabay C., “ Mouse neutrophils express the decoy type 2 interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R2) constitutively and in acute inflammatory conditions,” J. Leukoc. Biol. 94, 791–802 (2013). 10.1189/jlb.0113035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Arend W. P., Palmer G., and Gabay C., “ IL-1, IL-18, and IL-33 families of cytokines,” Immunol. Rev. 223, 20–38 (2008). 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00624.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Arend W. P., Welgus H. G., Thompson R. C., and Eisenberg S. P., “ Biological properties of recombinant human monocyte-derived interleukin 1 receptor antagonist,” J. Clin. Invest. 85, 1694–1697 (1990). 10.1172/JCI114622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Shi G., Field D. J., Ko K. A., Ture S., Srivastava K., Levy S., Kowalska M. A., Poncz M., Fowell D. J., and Morrell C. N., “ Platelet factor 4 limits Th17 differentiation and cardiac allograft rejection,” J. Clin. Invest. 124, 543–552 (2014). 10.1172/JCI71858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Pelus L. M., Bian H., King A. G., and Fukuda S., “ Neutrophil-derived MMP-9 mediates synergistic mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by the combination of G-CSF and the chemokines GRObeta/CXCL2 and GRObetaT/CXCL2delta4,” Blood 103, 110–119 (2004). 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Pittman K. and Kubes P., “ Damage-associated molecular patterns control neutrophil recruitment,” J. Innate Immun. 5, 315–323 (2013). 10.1159/000347132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Dorward D. A., Lucas C. D., Chapman G. B., Haslett C., Dhaliwal K., and Rossi A. G., “ The role of formylated peptides and formyl peptide receptor 1 in governing neutrophil function during acute inflammation,” Am. J. Pathol. 185, 1172–1184 (2015). 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.01.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Laroumanie F., Korneva A., Bersi M. R., Alexander M. R., Xiao L., Zhong X., Van Beusecum J. P., Chen Y., Saleh M. A., McMaster W. G., Gavulic K. A., Dale B. L., Zhao S., Guo Y., Shyr Y., Perrien D. S., Cox N. J., Curci J. A., Humphrey J. D., and Madhur M. S., “ LNK deficiency promotes acute aortic dissection and rupture,” JCI Insight 3, e122558 (2018). 10.1172/jci.insight.122558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Cao R. Y., Amand T., Ford M. D., Piomelli U., and Funk C. D., “ The murine angiotensin II-Induced abdominal aortic aneurysm model: Rupture risk and inflammatory progression patterns,” Front Pharmacol. 1, 9 (2010). 10.3389/fphar.2010.00009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Chu M., Wu R., Qin S., Hua W., Shan Z., Rong X., Zeng J., Hong L., Sun Y., Liu Y., Li W., Wang S., and Zhang C., “ Bone marrow-derived microRNA-223 works as an endocrine genetic signal in vascular endothelial cells and participates in vascular injury from Kawasaki disease,” J. Am. Heart Assoc. 6, e004878 (2017). 10.1161/JAHA.116.004878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Leuenberger C., Schuoler C., Bye H., Mignan C., Rechsteiner T., Hillinger S., Opitz I., Marsland B., Faiz A., Hiemstra P. S., Timens W., Camici G. G., Kohler M., Huber L. C., and Brock M., “ MicroRNA-223 controls the expression of histone deacetylase 2: A novel axis in COPD,” J. Mol. Med. 94, 725–734 (2016). 10.1007/s00109-016-1388-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Zhou W., Pal A. S., Hsu A. Y., Gurol T., Zhu X., Wirbisky-Hershberger S. E., Freeman J. L., Kasinski A. L., and Deng Q., “ MicroRNA-223 suppresses the canonical NF-kappaB pathway in basal keratinocytes to dampen neutrophilic inflammation,” Cell Rep. 22, 1810–1823 (2018). 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kin K., Miyagawa S., Fukushima S., Shirakawa Y., Torikai K., Shimamura K., Daimon T., Kawahara Y., Kuratani T., and Sawa Y., “ Tissue- and plasma-specific MicroRNA signatures for atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysm,” J. Am. Heart Assoc. 1, e000745 (2012). 10.1161/JAHA.112.000745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Veverka V., Henry A. J., Slocombe P. M., Ventom A., Mulloy B., Muskett F. W., Muzylak M., Greenslade K., Moore A., Zhang L., Gong J., Qian X., Paszty C., Taylor R. J., Robinson M. K., and Carr M. D., “ Characterization of the structural features and interactions of sclerostin: Molecular insight into a key regulator of Wnt-mediated bone formation,” J. Biol. Chem. 284, 10890–10900 (2009). 10.1074/jbc.M807994200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Krishna S. M., Seto S. W., Jose R. J., Li J., Morton S. K., Biros E., Wang Y., Nsengiyumva V., Lindeman J. H., Loots G. G., Rush C. M., Craig J. M., and Golledge J., “ Wnt signaling pathway inhibitor sclerostin inhibits angiotensin II-induced aortic aneurysm and atherosclerosis,” Arterioscler., Thromb., Vasc. Biol. 37, 553–566 (2017). 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. O'Donnell L. C., Druhan L. J., and Avalos B. R., “ Molecular characterization and expression analysis of leucine-rich alpha2-glycoprotein, a novel marker of granulocytic differentiation,” J. Leukoc. Biol. 72, 478–485 (2002). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Shirai R., Hirano F., Ohkura N., Ikeda K., and Inoue S., “ Up-regulation of the expression of leucine-rich alpha(2)-glycoprotein in hepatocytes by the mediators of acute-phase response,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 382, 776–779 (2009). 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.03.104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Lee H., Fujimoto M., Ohkawara T., Honda H., Serada S., Terada Y., and Naka T., “ Leucine rich alpha-2 glycoprotein is a potential urinary biomarker for renal tubular injury,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 498, 1045–1051 (2018). 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.03.111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Rateri D. L., Davis F. M., Balakrishnan A., Howatt D. A., Moorleghen J. J., O'Connor W. N., Charnigo R., Cassis L. A., and Daugherty A., “ Angiotensin II induces region-specific medial disruption during evolution of ascending aortic aneurysms,” Am. J. Pathol. 184, 2586–2595 (2014). 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.05.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Gavish L., Beeri R., Gilon D., Rubinstein C., Berlatzky Y., Gavish L. Y., Bulut A., Harlev M., Reissman P., and Gertz S. D., “ Inadequate reinforcement of transmedial disruptions at branch points subtends aortic aneurysm formation in apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice,” Cardiovasc. Pathol. 23, 152–159 (2014). 10.1016/j.carpath.2013.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Cuomo F., Ferruzzi J., Humphrey J. D., and Figueroa C. A., “ An experimental-computational study of catheter induced alterations in pulse wave velocity in anesthetized mice,” Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43, 1555–1570 (2015). 10.1007/s10439-015-1272-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Trapnell C., Roberts A., Goff L., Pertea G., Kim D., Kelley D. R., Pimentel H., Salzberg S. L., Rinn J. L., and Pachter L., “ Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks,” Nat. Protoc. 7, 562–578 (2012). 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Draghici S., Khatri P., Tarca A. L., Amin K., Done A., Voichita C., Georgescu C., and Romero R., “ A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis,” Genome Res. 17, 1537–1545 (2007). 10.1101/gr.6202607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Huang da W., Sherman B. T., and Lempicki R. A., “ Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources,” Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009). 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Huang da W., Sherman B. T., and Lempicki R. A., “ Bioinformatics enrichment tools: Paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists,” Nucl. Acids Res. 37, 1–13 (2009). 10.1093/nar/gkn923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.