Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;2017(5):CD006185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub4

Brincks 2011.

Methods Randomised cross‐over trial
 Method of randomisation: shuffled envelopes
 Blinding of outcome assessors: no
 Adverse events: none
 Deaths: none
 Dropouts: none
 ITT: yes
Participants Country: Denmark
 13 participants (7 in treatment group, 6 in control group)
 All participants were ambulatory at start of study
 Mean age: 59 to 61 years (control and treatment groups, respectively)
 Inclusion criteria: unknown
 Exclusion criteria: unknown
Interventions 2 arms:
  • Group 1 received 3 weeks of robotic‐assisted treadmill training (Lokomat), followed (after cross‐over) by 3 weeks of physiotherapy

  • Group 2 received 3 weeks of physiotherapy followed (after cross‐over) by 3 weeks of robotic‐assisted treadmill training (Lokomat)

Outcomes Outcomes were recorded at baseline, after 3 and 6 weeks
 Primary outcomes: single support stance time in impaired extremity and gait asymmetry and swing time ratio
 Secondary outcomes: walking speed
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Shuffling envelopes
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Using sealed, shuffled envelopes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No blinding was done.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk ITT