Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;2017(5):CD006185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub4

Dias 2006.

Methods RCT
 Method of randomisation: permuted block randomisation
 Blinding of outcome assessors: stated as blinded
 Adverse events: none stated
 Deaths: none
 Dropouts: none
 ITT: not stated but probably done because there were no dropouts
Participants Country: Portugal
 40 participants (20 in treatment group, 20 in control group)
 Ambulatory at start of study
 Mean age: 69 years
 Inclusion criteria: first‐ever stroke patients > 12 months after stroke; age > 18 and < 80 years; cognitive (MMSE > 19) and communication capacities to understand the treatment; absence of cardiac, psychological, and orthopaedic contraindications
 Exclusion criteria: not stated
Interventions 2 arms:
  • Control group used the Bobath method, 5 times a week for 5 weeks

  • Experimental group used the Gait Trainer for the same time and frequency

Outcomes Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 4 weeks and 3 months:
  • Motricity Index

  • Toulouse Motor Scale

  • Modified Ashworth Scale

  • Berg Balance Scale

  • Rivermead Motor Score

  • Fugl‐Meyer Stroke Scale (lower limb and balance)

  • FAC

  • Barthel Index

  • 10‐metre walking test and gait cycle parameters

  • Timed Up and Go test

  • 6‐minute walking distance test

  • Step test


After study end and at follow‐up, participants rated satisfaction with and efficiency of treatment in a self questionnaire (Likert scale).
Notes Published and unpublished data provided by the authors.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Central allocation
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not done
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing outcome data