Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;2017(5):CD006185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub4

Husemann 2007.

Methods RCT
 Method of randomisation: opaque envelopes, stratified by side of paresis and aetiology
 Blinding of outcome assessors: yes
 Adverse events: 2 (1 in experimental group, 1 in control group)
 Deaths: none
 Dropouts: 2 (1 in experimental group, 1 in control group)
 ITT analysis: not provided for all dropouts
Participants Country: Germany
 32 participants (17 in treatment group, 15 in control group)
 Non‐ambulatory at start of study
 Mean age: not provided
 Inclusion criteria: not provided
 Exclusion criteria: not provided
Interventions 2 arms:
  • Robotic gait trainer (Lokomat), 30 minutes per weekday for 4 weeks

  • Conventional physiotherapy, 30 minutes per weekday for 4 weeks


Both groups received additional 30 minutes of physiotherapy daily.
Outcomes Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 4 weeks:
  • FAC

Notes Published and unpublished data provided by the authors.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random numbers generated by a computer program, block randomisation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed, opaque envelopes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Evaluating therapist blinded for group allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient reporting of attrition/exclusions to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’