Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;2017(5):CD006185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub4

Mayr 2008.

Methods RCT
 Method of randomisation: unclear
 Blinding of outcome assessors: unclear
 Adverse events: not stated
 Deaths: unclear, probably none
 Dropouts: 13 (4 in experimental group, 9 in control group)
 ITT analysis: not stated
Participants Country: Austria
 74 participants (37 in treatment group, 37 in control group)
 Most participants in both groups were non‐ambulatory at start of study
 Mean age: not stated
 Inclusion criteria: primary ischaemic lesion of the medial cerebral artery, between 10 days and 6 weeks after stroke, stable cardiovascular system, ability to walk with assistance of 1 therapist
 Exclusion criteria: brainstem lesions, thrombosis, severe contractures, good walking ability with standing only help by therapist
Interventions 2 arms:
  • Add‐on robotic training (Lokomat), 45 minutes, 5 times a week for 8 weeks

  • Add‐on conventional physiotherapy, received equal time and sessions of conventional gait training

Outcomes Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after training phase:
  • Modified Emory Functional Ambulatory Profile

  • Hochzirl Walking Aids Profile

  • Rivermead Motor Index

  • Mobility milestones

  • Gait analysis

Notes Published as conference abstract and unpublished data
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Software‐generated list
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Described concealed allocation
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Described as blinded evaluator
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No ITT