Peurala 2005.
| Methods | RCT Method of randomisation: an investigator not involved in the study randomly assigned participants to groups using concealed envelopes Blinding of outcome assessors: no Adverse events: none Deaths: none Dropouts: none ITT analysis: not stated | |
| Participants | Country: Finland 45 participants (15 in treatment group A, 15 in treatment group B, 15 in control group) Ambulatory and non‐ambulatory at study onset Mean age: 52 years Inclusion criteria: first supratentorial stroke with duration of illness longer than 6 months, younger than 65 years of age, slow or difficult walking, no unstable cardiovascular disease, no severe malposition of joints, no severe cognitive or communicative disorders, written informed consent Exclusion criteria: not stated | |
| Interventions | 3 arms:
All participants practised gait for 15 sessions over 3 weeks (each session lasting 20 minutes) and received an additional 55 minutes daily physiotherapy. |
|
| Outcomes | Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 2 and 3 weeks and 6 months:
|
|
| Notes | Published and unpublished data provided by the authors. | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | An investigator not involved in the study randomly assigned participants to groups using concealed envelopes. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Concealed envelopes |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not done |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear if reasons for missing outcome data are unlikely to be related to true outcome |