Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;2017(5):CD006185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub4

Schwartz 2006.

Methods RCT
 Method of randomisation: block sampling method (each block contained 6 participants: 4 experimental group and 2 control group)
 Blinding of outcome assessors: no
 Adverse events: 5 (3 in experimental group, 2 in control group)
 Deaths: none
 Dropouts: 11 (8 in experimental group, 3 in control group)
 ITT: no (stated, but 2 participants from the control group were excluded from analysis)
Participants Country: Israel
 67 participants (at October 2006) (37 in treatment group, 30 in control group)
 Non‐ambulatory at study onset
 Mean age: 60 years
 Inclusion criteria: first stroke, until 3 months after stroke
 Exclusion criteria: not provided
Interventions 2 arms:
  • Physiotherapy with additional gait training using the Lokomat 3 times a week for 6 weeks

  • Physiotherapy with additional gait training 3 times a week for 6 weeks

Outcomes Outcomes were recorded at baseline and after 3, 6, and 9 weeks:
  • FAC

  • NIHSS

  • Stroke Activity Scale

  • Functional Independence Measure

  • Gait velocity

  • 2‐minute walk test

  • Timed Up and Go Test

  • Stair‐climbing test

Notes Published and unpublished data provided by the authors.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Block sampling
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not done
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk For dichotomous outcome data, the proportion of missing outcomes compared with observed event risk was enough to induce clinically relevant bias into intervention effect estimate.