Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;2017(5):CD010172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010172.pub2

Menga 2019.

Methods RCT, cross‐over design
Participants Total number of participants: 10
Inclusion criteria: acute‐onset, non‐cardiogenic respiratory distress; pulmonary infiltrates on the chest x‐ray; SpO2 < 90 %
Exclusion criteria: none in abstract
Interventions Intervention group (HFNC): flow = 50 L/min
Control group (helmet NIV): PEEP = 10 cm H2O. IPAP adjusted to achieve peak inspiratory flow = 100 L/min)
Outcomes All outcomes measured: arterial blood gases, inspiratory effort (oesophageal pressure); respiratory rate; dyspnoea; device‐related discomfort
Outcomes relevant to this review: arterial blood gases; respiratory rate; dyspnoea; device‐related discomfort
Notes Contact: LS Menga, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rome, Italy
Currently published only as an abstract. We are awaiting publication of the full report in order to assess eligibility, collect sufficient study characteristics, and include data in the review.