Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;2017(5):CD010172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010172.pub2

NCT02290548.

Study name Effect of high‐flow nasal oxygen vs standard oxygen therapy on extubation outcome with high risk of extubation failure in medical ICU patient
Methods RCT, parallel‐group design
Participants Estimated number of participants: 400
Setting: ICU, Taiwan
Inclusion criteria: MV > 48 hrs; age > 65 years; cardiac failure primary indication for MV; COPD; bronchiectasis; old pulmonary tuberculosis with lung destruction; chronic renal failure; neuromuscular disease; BMI > 30 kg/m2; inability to manage respiratory secretions; ARDS
Exclusion criteria: tracheostomy; recent facial trauma; active gastrointestinal bleeding; planned NIV support post‐extubation
Interventions Intervention group (HFNC):
Control group (standard oxygen therapy): nasal cannula or mask
Outcomes All outcomes measured: reintubation rate; need for NIV; ICU readmission due to respiratory failure; ICU mortality; ICU length of stay; hospital mortality; hospital length of stay; hospital‐acquired pneumonia; desaturation to SpO2 < 90 %; severe hypoxaemia PaO2/FiO2 < 200; hypercapnia PaCO2 > 50; arterial pH < 7.30; severe tachypnoea (respiratory rate > 40 breaths/min)
Outcomes relevant to this review: reintubation rate; need for NIV; ICU length of stay; hospital mortality; hospital length of stay; hospital‐acquired pneumonia
Starting date 14 November 2014
Contact information Kuo Li Kuo, lmn4093@gmail.com
Notes