Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;2017(5):CD010172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010172.pub2

NCT03014869.

Study name Comparison of high‐flow nasal cannula and non‐invasive positive ventilation (NPPV) in moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (AECOPD)
Methods RCT, parallel‐group design
Participants Estimated number of participants: 351
Setting: China
Inclusion criteria: AECOPD; 7.35 > pH ≥ 7.25,PaCO2 > 50 mmHg
Exclusion criteria: contraindications for NPPV, such as thick sputum, cough weakness, haemodynamic instability, etc.; need to be intubated immediately; refuse to engage in the study; severe organ dysfunction
Interventions Intervention group (HFNC): flow = 25 to 60 L/min. FiO2 titrated to target SpO2 of 90 to 95%.
Control group (NPPV)
Outcomes All outcomes measured: intubation demand within 90 days; intubation rate within 90 days.
Outcomes relevant to this review: intubation rate within 90 days
Starting date 9 January 2020
Contact information Jingen Xia, xiajingen_00632@163.com
Notes