Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;2017(5):CD010172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010172.pub2

NCT04156139.

Study name High‐flow nasal cannula versus noninvasive positive pressure ventilation therapy after early extubation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Methods RCT, parallel‐group design
Participants Estimated number of participants: 502
Setting: ICU, China
Inclusion Criteria: age = 40 to 85 years; COPD patients with bronchopulmonary infection; patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure treated with invasive mechanical ventilation for between 48 hours and 14 days; reached the pulmonary infection control window; have self‐care ability with oxygen supply during stable phase
Exclusion Criteria: severe organ dysfunction; myopathy or myasthenia gravis; upper airway obstruction; a large amount of secretions and inability to drain
Interventions Intervention group (HFNC): flow rate = 45 to 55 L/min; FiO2 adjusted to maintain SpO2 ≥ 92%
Control group (NIV): BiPAP; initial PEEP = 5 cm H2O; IPAP = 10 cm H2O; adjusted to target tidal volume of 6‐8 mL/kg
Outcomes All outcomes measured: reintubation within 7 days; weaning failure within 7 days (composite criterion including reintubation and all‐cause mortality)
Outcomes relevant to this review: reintubation, all‐cause mortality
Starting date 7th November 2019
Contact information Han Xiaobo, hansir510@163.com
Notes