Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 14;2017(6):CD011038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011038.pub2

Comparison 1. Topical antimicrobial dressing compared with non‐antimicrobial dressing.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Proportion of wounds healed 5 945 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.28 [1.12, 1.45]
1.1 Short term follow up 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.6 [1.00, 2.57]
1.2 Medium term follow‐up 4 865 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.26 [1.10, 1.44]
2 Incidence of infection: medium term follow‐up 2 173 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.04, 3.10]
3 Surgical resection: medium term follow‐up 1 317 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.04, 2.72]
4 Adverse events 1 134 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.62, 1.48]