Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 29;2017(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2

Table 4.

Characteristics of participants providing individual participant data (baseline investigations)

Trial Electroencephalographic (EEG) Computerised Tomography (CT)
/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Neurological exams
Normal Abnormal Missing Normal Abnormal Missing Normal Abnormal Missing
Banu 2007 49 (45%) 54 (50%) 5 (5%) 21 (19%) 5 (5%) 82 (76%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 108 (100%)
Baulac 2012 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 583 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 583 (100%) 478 (82%) 103 (18%) 2 (0%)
Bill 1997 126 (44%) 152 (53%) 9 (3%) 173 (60%) 69 (24%) 45 (16%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 287 (100%)
Biton 2001 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 136 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 136 (100%) 89 (65%) 46 (34%) 1 (1%)
Brodie 1995a 62 (46%) 72 (53%) 2 (1%) 82 (60%) 12 (9%) 42 (31%) 123 (90%) 13 (10%) 0 (0%)
Brodie 1995b 76 (61%) 42 (34%) 6 (5%) 72 (58%) 20 (16%) 32 (26%) 108 (87%) 16 (13%) 0 (0%)
Brodie 1999 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 150 (100%) 62 (41%) 87 (58%) 1 (1%) 90 (60%) 60 (40%) 0 (0%)
Brodie 2007 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 579 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 579 (100%) 493 (85%) 86 (15%) 0 (0%)
Chadwick 1998 107 (37%) 179 (61%) 6 (2%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 292 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 292 (100%)
Craig 1994 28 (17%) 74 (45%) 64 (39%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 166 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 166 (100%)
de Silva 1996 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 173 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 173 (100%) 152 (88%) 15 (9%) 6 (3%)
Dizdarer 2000 18 (35%) 34 (65%) 0 (0%) 50 (96%) 2 (4%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 52 (100%)
Eun 2012 6 (7%) 78 (93%) 0 (0%) 75 (89%) 9 (11%) 0 (0%) 83 (99%) 1 (1%) 0 (0%)
Guerreiro 1997 92 (48%) 99 (51%) 2 (1%) 126 (65%) 12 (6%) 55 (28%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 193 (100%)
Heller 1995 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 243 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 243 (100%) 222 (91%) 19 (8%) 2 (1%)
Kwan 2009 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 81 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 81 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 81 (100%)
Lee 2011 58 (53%) 52 (47%) 0 (0%) 74 (67%) 36 (33%) 0 (0%) 110 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Mattson 1985 126 (27%) 343 (72%) 6 (1%) 308 (65%) 119 (25%) 48 (10%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 475 (100%)
Mattson 1992 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 480 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 480 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 480 (100%)
Nieto‐Barrera 2001 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 622 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 622 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 622 (100%)
Ogunrin 2005 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 55 (100%) 37 (67%) 0 (0%) 18 (33%) 55 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Pal 1998 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 94 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 94 (100%) 24 (26%) 70 (74%) 0 (0%)
Placencia 1993 180 (94%) 12 (6%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 192 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 192 (100%)
Privitera 2003
(CBZ branch)a
0 (0%) 0 (0%) 395 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 395 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 395 (100%)
Privitera 2003
(VPS branch)a
0 (0%) 0 (0%) 225 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 225 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 225 (100%)
Ramsey 1992 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 136 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 136 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 136 (100%)
Ramsey 2010 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 261 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 261 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 261 (100%)
Reunanen 1996 13 (4%) 13 (4%) 325 (93%) 16 (5%) 5 (1%) 330 (94%) 305 (87%) 46 (13%) 0 (0%)
Richens 1994 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 300 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 300 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 300 (100%)
SANAD A 2007 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1721 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1721 (100%) 1267 (74%) 410 (24%) 44 (3%)
SANAD B 2007 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 716 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 716 (100%) 595 (83%) 107 (15%) 14 (2%)
Steiner 1999 103 (57%) 71 (39%) 7 (4%) 111 (61%) 33 (18%) 37 (20%) 165 (91%) 16 (9%) 0 (0%)
Stephen 2007 51 (22%) 121 (53%) 55 (24%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 227 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 227 (100%)
Trinka 2013
(CBZ branch)1
0 (0%) 0 (0%) 999 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 999 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 999 (100%)
Trinka 2013
(VPS branch)1
0 (0%) 0 (0%) 703 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 703 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 703 (100%)
Turnbull 1985 70 (50%) 70 (50%) 0 (0%) 17 (12%) 10 (7%) 113 (81%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 140 (100%)
Verity 1995 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 260 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 260 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 260 (100%)
Werhahn 2015 117 (32%) 242 (67%) 2 (1%) 78 (22%) 282 (78%) 1 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 361 (100%)
Total 1282 (10%) 1708 (14%) 9401 (75%) 1302 (11%) 701 (6%) 10,388 (83%) 4359 (36%) 1008 (8%) 7024 (56%)

aTrials designed in two strata based on whether recommended treatment would be CBZ or VPS. Within the two strata, participants were randomised to TPM in Privitera 2003/LEV in Trinka 2013 or CBZ/VPS depending on the strata. Data analysed according to the separate strata (CBZ branch or VPS branch) in this review.