Methods | Multicentre, randomised, open‐label trial conducted at 21 sites in seven European countries between December 2001 and December 2003 3 treatment arms: CBZ, OXC, VPS (randomised in a 1:2:1 ratio) |
|
Participants | Children and adolescents (aged 6‐17) with newly diagnosed partial seizures. Participants must have had at least 2 unprovoked partial seizures (simple and complex partial and partial evolving into secondarily generalised seizures) in the 3 months prior to study entry Number randomised: CBZ = 28, OXC = 55, VPS = 29 51 male participants (46%) 100% of participants had partial epilepsy Median age (range): 10 (6‐16) |
|
Interventions | Monotherapy with CBZ, OXC or VPS Dose achieved (mean (SD)): CBZ =14.4 (3.6) mg/kg/d, VPS = 20.7 (7.5) mg/kg/d Study duration: 6 months, Range of follow‐up not stated |
|
Outcomes | Cognitive testing: Computerized Visual Searching Task, assessing mental information processing speed and attention. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Raven’s Standard Progressive matrices for children: psychomotor speed, alertness, memory and learning, and non‐verbal intelligence. Percentage of participants remaining seizure‐free throughout treatment Most common adverse events Treatment satisfaction on a 4‐point scale from poor to very good |
|
Notes | IPD requested from trial sponsor Novartis but data could not be provided due to time elapsed since the trial was completed. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | An interactive voice‐response system was used to automate the randomisation of participants to treatment groups within age strata |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | An interactive voice‐response system was used to automate the randomisation of participants to treatment groups within age strata |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study (justified as primary and secondary cognitive outcomes were objective) |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study (justified as primary and secondary cognitive outcomes were objective) |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Attrition rate reported. Most results reported only for the per‐protocol population who completed the study |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All cognitive, efficacy, and tolerability outcomes specified in the methods sections were reported well in the results section. No protocol was available. Outcomes chosen for this review were not reported |
Other bias | Low risk | None detected |