Methods | Randomised, parallel‐group, open‐label trial conducted in 2 centres in the UK 4 treatment arms: CBZ, PHB, PHT, VPS |
|
Participants | Adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy (2 or more untreated partial or generalised tonic‐clonic seizures in the 12 months preceding the trial) Number randomised: CBZ = 61, PHB = 58, PHT = 63, VPS = 61 117 male participants (48%) 102 participants with partial epilepsy (42%) Mean age (range): 32 (13‐77) years |
|
Interventions | Monotherapy with CBZ, PHB, PHT or VPS Median daily dose achieved: CBZ = 600 mg/d, PHB = 105 mg/d, PHT = 300 mg/d, VPS = 800 mg/d Range of follow‐up: 0‐166 months |
|
Outcomes | Time to first seizure recurrence after start of therapy Time to 12‐month remission from all seizures Adverse effects and withdrawals due to adverse events |
|
Notes | IPD provided for all outcomes of this review by the Medical Research Council | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation list generated using permuted blocks of size 8 or 16 with stratification for centre, seizure type and presence of neurological signs |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation concealed via 4 batches of concealed, opaque envelopes |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded, authors state masking of treatment would not be “practical” and would have “introduced bias due to a very large drop‐out rate.” Lack of blinding may have influenced the withdrawal rate. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded, authors state masking of treatment would not be “practical” and would have “introduced bias due to a very large drop‐out rate.” Lack of blinding may have influenced the withdrawal rate. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Attrition rates reported, all randomised participants analysed from IPD provided (see footnote 2) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Protocol provided. All outcomes reported or calculated with IPD provided (see footnote 2) |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified |