Methods | Parallel‐design RCT conducted in Madras (Chennai), India Three treatment arms: PHB, PHT, VPS |
|
Participants | Children with more than 1 previously untreated generalised tonic clonic (afebrile) seizure Number randomised: PHB group = 51, PHT = 52, VPS = 48 81 boys (54%) 0% partial epilepsy (all had generalised epilepsy) Age range: 4‐12 years |
|
Interventions | Monotherapy with PHT or VPS Starting doses: PHB: 3 mg/kg/d‐ 5 mg/kg/d PHT: 5 mg/kg/d‐ 8 mg/kg/d, VPS: 15 mg/kg/d‐ 50 mg/kg/d Dose achieved not stated Range of follow‐up (months): 22‐36 |
|
Outcomes | Proportion with recurrence of seizures Adverse events |
|
Notes | Outcomes chosen for this review were not reported. IPD not available | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants randomised via a computer‐generated list of random numbers |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double–blinded using additional placebo tablets, unclear who was blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double–blinded using additional placebo tablets, unclear who was blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Attrition rates reported, all randomised participants analysed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No protocol available, outcomes chosen for this review not reported, Seizure and adverse event outcomes well reported |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified |