Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 29;2017(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2
Methods Parallel‐design RCT conducted in Madras (Chennai), India
Three treatment arms: PHB, PHT, VPS
Participants Children with more than 1 previously untreated generalised tonic clonic (afebrile) seizure
Number randomised: PHB group = 51, PHT = 52, VPS = 48
81 boys (54%)
0% partial epilepsy (all had generalised epilepsy)
Age range: 4‐12 years
Interventions Monotherapy with PHT or VPS
Starting doses: PHB: 3 mg/kg/d‐ 5 mg/kg/d PHT: 5 mg/kg/d‐ 8 mg/kg/d, VPS: 15 mg/kg/d‐ 50 mg/kg/d
Dose achieved not stated
Range of follow‐up (months): 22‐36
Outcomes Proportion with recurrence of seizures
Adverse events
Notes Outcomes chosen for this review were not reported. IPD not available
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Participants randomised via a computer‐generated list of random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Double–blinded using additional placebo tablets, unclear who was blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Double–blinded using additional placebo tablets, unclear who was blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Attrition rates reported, all randomised participants analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No protocol available, outcomes chosen for this review not reported, Seizure and adverse event outcomes well reported
Other bias Low risk None identified