Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 27;2017(6):CD007047. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007047.pub2

Bokemeyer OPUS 2009.

Methods Phase II open‐label RCT; n = 338
Participants Nonresectable metastatic CRC
Interventions FOLFOX4 with cetuximab versus FOLFOX4
Outcomes Primary endpoint: tumour response rate. Secondary endpoints: exploratory only
Notes Funded by Merck KGaA. Funding: Bokemeyer: consultant/advisory role (Merck Serono), honoraria (Merck Serono, Sanofi‐Aventis), research funding (Merck Serono); Koralewski: none declared.
Follow‐up: 44.1 months (cetuximab arm), 31.8 months (standard arm)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation (1:1) was carried out using a stratified permuted‐block procedure, with ECOG PS (0 and 1 vs 2) as a stratification factor.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details provided.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Open‐label trial (but blinded review for primary outcome; see below)
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The independent review committee conducted a blinded review of images and clinical data using a common set of prespecified criteria.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 1/170 dropout in experimental arm, 0/168 in control arm
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All stated outcomes reported.
Other bias Low risk No other significant bias present; funders did not have inappropriate influence.