Bokemeyer OPUS 2009.
Methods | Phase II open‐label RCT; n = 338 | |
Participants | Nonresectable metastatic CRC | |
Interventions | FOLFOX4 with cetuximab versus FOLFOX4 | |
Outcomes | Primary endpoint: tumour response rate. Secondary endpoints: exploratory only | |
Notes | Funded by Merck KGaA. Funding: Bokemeyer: consultant/advisory role (Merck Serono), honoraria (Merck Serono, Sanofi‐Aventis), research funding (Merck Serono); Koralewski: none declared. Follow‐up: 44.1 months (cetuximab arm), 31.8 months (standard arm) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation (1:1) was carried out using a stratified permuted‐block procedure, with ECOG PS (0 and 1 vs 2) as a stratification factor. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details provided. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Open‐label trial (but blinded review for primary outcome; see below) |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The independent review committee conducted a blinded review of images and clinical data using a common set of prespecified criteria. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 1/170 dropout in experimental arm, 0/168 in control arm |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All stated outcomes reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other significant bias present; funders did not have inappropriate influence. |