Cha 2012.
Methods | Allocation: randomised. Blindness: unknown. Duration: 4 weeks. Design: parallel group. |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia (DSM‐IV). History: unknown. N = 60. Age: unknown. Sex: unknown. Setting: inpatients. | |
Interventions | 1. Receptive music therapy: song discussion, music reminiscence, musical synchronisation, and music and imagery. N = 30. 2. Standard care (medicine, health education and occupational and recreational therapy). N = 30. |
|
Outcomes | Cognitive functioning, abstract thinking: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST; Heaton 1993). Cognitive functioning, memory: Clinical Memory Test (CMT; Xu 1986). |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised, no details given |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Due to the nature of the intervention it was not possible to blind those who received music therapy or those who delivered it. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details given. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No attrition |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No study protocol available. All outcome measures described in the study were considered in the analysis. |
Other bias | Low risk | Adequate music therapy method: yes. Adequate music therapy training: yes. No financial, personal or other interests producing bias detected. |