Skip to main content
. 2017 May 29;2017(5):CD004025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004025.pub4

Cha 2012.

Methods Allocation: randomised.
Blindness: unknown.
Duration: 4 weeks.
Design: parallel group.
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (DSM‐IV).
 History: unknown.
 N = 60.
 Age: unknown.
 Sex: unknown.
 Setting: inpatients.
Interventions 1. Receptive music therapy: song discussion, music reminiscence, musical synchronisation, and music and imagery. N = 30.
2. Standard care (medicine, health education and occupational and recreational therapy). N = 30.
Outcomes Cognitive functioning, abstract thinking: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST; Heaton 1993).
Cognitive functioning, memory: Clinical Memory Test (CMT; Xu 1986).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, no details given
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Due to the nature of the intervention it was not possible to blind those who received music therapy or those who delivered it.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No details given.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No attrition
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No study protocol available. All outcome measures described in the study were considered in the analysis.
Other bias Low risk Adequate music therapy method: yes.
 Adequate music therapy training: yes.
 No financial, personal or other interests producing bias detected.