Chang 2013.
Methods | Allocation: randomised ‐ no further details. Blindness: unknown. Duration: 8 weeks. Design: parallel group. | |
Participants | Diagnosis: schizophrenia (CCMD‐3). History: mean 6.6 years, SD 4.2 years. N = 72. Age: mean 34.4 years, SD 12. Sex: 49 M, 23 F. Setting: inpatients. | |
Interventions | 1. Receptive and active group music therapy (singing, music relaxation, music reminiscence, musical story, music discussion, song creation, playing instruments; all activities were led by a music therapist). 1 hour per session, 5 sessions a week for 8 weeks (40 sessions in total). N = 36, M 25. 2. Standard care (conventional drug therapy, general occupational and recreational therapy). N = 36, M 24. |
|
Outcomes | Quality of life, general/subjective well‐being: General Well‐Being Schedule (GWB; Fazio 1977). Qualitiy of life, social support: Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ; Sarason 1983). |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Due to the nature of the intervention it was not possible to blind those who received music therapy or those who delivered it. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No details given. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | no attrition |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No study protocol available. All outcome measures described in the study were considered in the analysis. |
Other bias | Low risk | Adequate music therapy method: yes. Adequate music therapy training: yes. No financial, personal or other interests producing bias detected. |