Skip to main content
. 2017 May 29;2017(5):CD004025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004025.pub4

Chang 2013.

Methods Allocation: randomised ‐ no further details.
 Blindness: unknown.
 Duration: 8 weeks.
 Design: parallel group.
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (CCMD‐3).
 History: mean 6.6 years, SD 4.2 years.
 N = 72.
 Age: mean 34.4 years, SD 12.
 Sex: 49 M, 23 F.
 Setting: inpatients.
Interventions 1. Receptive and active group music therapy (singing, music relaxation, music reminiscence, musical story, music discussion, song creation, playing instruments; all activities were led by a music therapist). 1 hour per session, 5 sessions a week for 8 weeks (40 sessions in total). N = 36, M 25.
2. Standard care (conventional drug therapy, general occupational and recreational therapy). N = 36, M 24.
Outcomes Quality of life, general/subjective well‐being: General Well‐Being Schedule (GWB; Fazio 1977).
Qualitiy of life, social support: Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ; Sarason 1983).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Due to the nature of the intervention it was not possible to blind those who received music therapy or those who delivered it.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No details given.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk no attrition
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No study protocol available. All outcome measures described in the study were considered in the analysis.
Other bias Low risk Adequate music therapy method: yes.
 Adequate music therapy training: yes.
 No financial, personal or other interests producing bias detected.