Skip to main content
. 2017 May 29;2017(5):CD004025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004025.pub4

Mohammadi 2012.

Methods Allocation: randomised.
Blindness: unknown.
Duration: 1 month.
Design: parallel group.
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (DSM‐IV).
History: unknown.
N = 96.
Age: mean 34.6 years, SD 8.05.
Sex: 61 M, 35 F.
Setting: inpatients.
Interventions 1. Active music therapy plus medication: playing music instruments, singing, body movements with music rhythms. 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions in total). N = 35.
2. 'Passive' music therapy plus medication: music listening. 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks (12 sessions in total). N = 27. Two music therapists implemented these two groups.
3. Neuroleptic medication. N = 34.
Outcomes Mental state, negative symptoms: Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS; Andreasen 1982).
Mental state, positive symptoms: Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS; Andreasen 1984).
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details given.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Due to the nature of the intervention it was not possible to blind those who received music therapy or those who delivered it.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No details given.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No attrition
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No study protocol available. All outcome measures described in the study were considered in the analyses
Other bias Low risk Adequate music therapy method: yes.
 Adequate music therapy training: yes. Music therapy was conducted by two music therapists.
 No personal, financial, or any other interests producing bias could be found.