Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;2015(7):CD009730. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009730.pub2

Master 2001.

Methods Double‐blind RCT.
Parallel design.
Duration: at least 10 days.
Single centre.
Country: Australia.
Participants 51 participants with CF experiencing a protocol‐defined exacerbation with P. aeruginosa isolated from sputum. Participants with an FVC lower than 40% predicted were excluded.
Intervention 1: 21 participants; mean (SD) age 16 (7) years.
Intervention 2: 23 participants; mean (SD) age 15 (5) years.
Interventions Intervention 1: IV ceftazidime 50 mg/kg/dose 3x daily and IV tobramycin 3 mg/kg/dose 3x daily.
Intervention 2: IV tobramycin 9 mg/kg/day 1x daily.
Outcomes Lung function (FEV1, FVC, FEF25‐75%), radiology, microbiology, adverse effects, time to next exacerbation.
Notes UoA issues ‐ each participant contributed on average 3 episodes.
Study was suspended for 3 months after 1 participant committed suicide, data from this period were not included.
We shall seek to contact the study authors for individual study data.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Described as randomised, stratified for age and disease progression, but no method detailed.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No detail given.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Described as double blind with medical and nursing staff and participants blinded with identical syringes and placebos.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Described as double blind.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Withdrawals were described and those participants who completed 10 days treatment but excluded for other reasons were included in an ITT analysis. The ITT analysis is described as not changing the effect of the short‐term analysis, but no data provided.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information.
Other bias High risk UoA issues ‐ each participant contributed multiple treatment episodes.