Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 14;35(4):711–723. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1488-9

Table 3.

Average diameter in different locations along the aorta

Maximal diameter (mm) Baseline Follow-up
Manual Semi-Automatic 1 Semi-Automatic 2 Manual Semi-Automatic 1 Semi-Automatic 2
Sinotubular junction 37 ± 5 40 ± 5 39 ± 5 39 ± 5 42 ± 5 42 ± 4
Mid ascending aorta 44 ± 5 43 ± 6 44 ± 6 47 ± 6 45 ± 6 46 ± 6
Proximal aortic arch 37 ± 5 37 ± 4 38 ± 5 39 ± 4 39 ± 4 39 ± 4
Mid aortic arch 29 ± 3 30 ± 5 30 ± 5 30 ± 4 33 ± 5 32 ± 5
Proximal descending aorta 27 ± 5 27 ± 5 27 ± 5 29 ± 7 30 ± 6 29 ± 6
Mid descending aorta 26 ± 4 26 ± 4 26 ± 4 27 ± 4 28 ± 5 27 ± 5
Diaphragm 24 ± 4 24 ± 5 24 ± 4 25 ± 4 25 ± 5 25 ± 5

Manual = measurements performed manually with the double oblique method by observer 1

Semi-automatic 1 and Semi-automatic 2 = semi-automatically calculated diameters based on the locations identified on the baseline scan by observers 1 and 2, respectively. Data are represented as mean ± SD