Table 1.
Summary of scenarios evaluated in the clinical utility index analyses
Scenario | Key attributes | Minimal PP (utility = 0) | Target PP | Optimistic PP (utility = 1) | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | rPFS HR | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.6 |
Diarrhea grade ≥ 3 | 20% | 15% | 10% | 0.4 | |
2 | rPFS HR | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.6 |
Diarrhea grade ≥ 3 | 20% | 15% | 10% | 0.3 | |
Rash grade ≥ 3 | 15% | 10% | 5% | 0.1 | |
3 | rPFS HR | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.6 |
Diarrhea grade ≥ 2 | 45% | 35% | 25% | 0.4 | |
4 | rPFS HR | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.6 |
Diarrhea grade ≥ 2 | 45% | 35% | 25% | 0.3 | |
Rash grade ≥ 2 | 18% | 12% | 6% | 0.1 |
HR, hazard ratio; PP, product profile; rPFS, radiographic progression‐free survival.