Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 25;19:39. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0364-5

Table 3.

Initial diagnosis and current period lab measurements of glycaemic control per treatment strategy

Variable Initial diagnosis Current period
Treatment Strategy Treatment Strategy P
All A B C All A B C
Patients n (%) 1189 (100%) 722 (60.7%) 334 (28.1%) 133 (11.2%) 1189 (100%) 241 (20.3%) 478 (40.2%) 470 (39.5%)
Full analysis set, n 572 (100%) 359 (62.8%) 151 (26.4%) 62 (10.8%) 1120 (100%) 225 (20.1%) 452 (40.4%) 443 (39.6%)
HbA1c %
Median (IQR) 7.8 (7.0–9.0) 7.5 (6.8–8.2) 8.6 (7.7–10.0) 10.0 (8.5–11.7) 6.9 (6.3–7.5) 6.4 (6.0–7.0) 6.7 (6.3–7.2) 7.3 (6.7–8.0) < 0.001b
Mean ± SD 8.4 ± 1.4 7.5 ± 1.6 8.3 ± 1.1 9.3 ± 2.2 7.1 ± 1.2 6.6 ± 1.0 6.9 ± 1.1 7.5 ± 1.2
Adjustedc mean ± SD 8.1 ± 0.2 8.3 ± 0.1 8.5 ± 0.1 7.0 ± 0.1 7.0 ± 0.1 7.2 ± 0.1 0.771
 < 6.5% 42 (7.0%) 38 (10.0%) 3 (1.0%) 1 (1.0%) 339 (30.0%) 115 (51.1%) 159 (35.2%) 65 (14.7%) < 0.001a
 [6.5–7.0%) 73 (12.0%) 65 (18.0%) 8 (5.0%) 0 (0%) 259 (23.0%) 52 (23.1%) 115 (25.4%) 92 (20.7%)
 < 7.0% 115 (19.0%) 103 (28.0%) 11 (6.0%) 1 (1.0%) 598 (53.0%) 167 (74.2%) 274 (60.6%) 157 (35.4%)
 [7.0–7.5%) 92 (16.0%) 73 (20.0%) 16 (10.0%) 3 (4.0%) 218 (19.0%) 34 (15.1%) 94 (20.8%) 90 (20.3%)
 [7.5–8.0%] 119 (20.0%) 81 (22.0%) 30 (19.0%) 8 (12.0%) 149 (13.0%) 14 (6.2%) 42 (9.3%) 93 (21.0%)
 > 8.0% 246 (43.0%) 102 (28.0%) 94 (62.0%) 50 (80.0%) 155 (13.0%) 10 (4.5%) 42 (9.3%) 103 (23.3%)
FPG mg/dl
Median (IQR) 177 (142–234) 160 (135–200) 200 (160–259) 240 (186–350) 126 (110–150) 120 (107–135) 126 (110–150) 130 (111–161) < 0.001b
Mean ± SD 201 ± 85 179 ± 63 221 ± 82 280 ± 133 136 ± 42 126 ± 32 135 ± 41 141 ± 46
Adjustedc mean ± SD 189.4 ± 6.9 201.1 ± 4.7 206.3 ± 5.1 134.8 ± 3.0 133.1 ± 2.0 138.6 ± 2.1 0.180
Median (IQR) NA NA NA NA 144 (130–160) 152 (138–178) 170 (145–200) 144 (130–160) <  0.001b
Adjustedc mean ± SD NA NA NA NA 163.2 ± 3.7 166.0 ± 2.5 169.6 ± 2.6 0.375

aChi – square independence test,

bKruskal Wallis test

cMean values adjusted for age, duration of diabetes, body mass index and family history of diabetes

Kruskal Wallis post-hoc pairwise comparisons between groups

•HbA1c % vs Treatment Group:

Treatment Group A vs Treatment Group B: p < 0.001.

Treatment Group A vs Treatment Group C: p < 0.001.

Treatment Group C vs Treatment Group B: p < 0.001

•FBG vs Treatment Group:

Treatment Group A vs Treatment Group B: p = 0.003

Treatment Group A vs Treatment Group C: p < 0.001.