Table 2.
Comparison of condylar guidance angle for both methods
| Method | Side | Number of individuals (n) | Mean±SD | Δ | 95% CI | t (df) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBCT | Right | 40 | 35.43±3.13 | 0.25 | −0.41–0.91 | 0.77 (39) | 0.44 |
| Left | 40 | 35.18±2.62 | |||||
| OPG | Right | 40 | 36.81±3.17 | 0.33 | −0.32–0.99 | 1.03 (39) | 0.31 |
| Left | 40 | 36.48±2.62 |
Data were given as mean±SD and the significant difference between the groups was assessed by using paired t-test. Δ: Mean difference, df: Degree of freedom, SD: Standard deviation, CBCT: Cone-beam computed tomography, OPG: Orthopantomograph, CI: Confidence interval