Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr-Jun;19(2):113–119. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_266_18

Table 3.

Gender wise comparison of condylar guidance angle for cone-beam computed tomography method

Side Gender Number of individuals (n) Mean±SD 95% CI t (df) P
Right Male 20 35.95±3.19 1.05 −0.95–3.05 1.06 (38) 0.29
Female 20 34.90±3.06
Left Male 20 35.95±2.46 1.55 −0.07–3.17 1.93 (38) 0.06
Female 20 34.40±2.60

Data were given as mean±SD and the significant difference between the groups was assessed by using t-test. df: Degree of freedom, SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval