Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr-Jun;19(2):113–119. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_266_18

Table 5.

Age-wise comparison of condylar guidance angle for cone-beam computed tomography method

Side Age (years) Number of individuals (n) Mean±SD 95% CI F (df) P
Right 25–30 17 37.41±2.93 36.23–38.59 17.05 (2/37) <0.001**
31-35 12 35.58±1.88 34.39–36.78
36-40 11 32.18±2.75 30.33–34.03
Left 25-30 17 36.59±2.12 35.50–37.68 9.44 (2/37) <0.001**
31-35 12 35.25±1.91 34.03–36.47
36-40 11 32.91±2.55 31.20–34.62

Data were given as mean±SD and the significant difference among the groups was assessed by using one-way ANOVA; P<0.001 showing the highly significant difference. df: Degree of freedom, SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval