Table 5.
Age-wise comparison of condylar guidance angle for cone-beam computed tomography method
| Side | Age (years) | Number of individuals (n) | Mean±SD | 95% CI | F (df) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | 25–30 | 17 | 37.41±2.93 | 36.23–38.59 | 17.05 (2/37) | <0.001** |
| 31-35 | 12 | 35.58±1.88 | 34.39–36.78 | |||
| 36-40 | 11 | 32.18±2.75 | 30.33–34.03 | |||
| Left | 25-30 | 17 | 36.59±2.12 | 35.50–37.68 | 9.44 (2/37) | <0.001** |
| 31-35 | 12 | 35.25±1.91 | 34.03–36.47 | |||
| 36-40 | 11 | 32.91±2.55 | 31.20–34.62 |
Data were given as mean±SD and the significant difference among the groups was assessed by using one-way ANOVA; P<0.001 showing the highly significant difference. df: Degree of freedom, SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval