Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;316(4):E674–E686. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00474.2018

Table 1.

BA profile for individual species

Average Intrahepatic BA Pool, % (n ≥ 8)
P Values for Direct Comparisons (t-test)
Bile Acid Species CC HC CH HH CC versus HC CH versus HH CC versus CH HC versus HH
MCA 24.5 29.5 37 25.5 0.02* 0.18 0.19 0.01*
TMCA 12 9.5 9 9.5 0.57 0.95 0.64 0.96
UDCA 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.99 0.80 0.53 0.57
TUDCA 1 0.5 1 1 0.56 0.39 0.19 0.93
GCA <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.18 0.74 0.68 0.79
TCA 46.5 47.5 42 50 0.12 0.54 0.77 0.02*
CA 5.5 4.5 6 5.5 0.52 0.49 0.45 0.67
TCDCA 2 3 1.5 2.5 0.07 0.85 0.02* <0.01*
TDCA 5.5 2.5 1 3.5 <0.01* 0.18 <0.01* 0.01*
TLCA <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.01* 0.76 0.97 <0.01*
LCA <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.20 0.63 0.32 0.03*
CDCA 1.09 1.5 0.5 1 0.07 0.67 0.49 0.02*
DCA 0.25 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.01* 0.14 0.09 0.03*
GCDCA <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.60 0.28 0.53 0.95
GDCA <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.02* 0.70 0.02* 0.44

Data show average percent of total intrahepatic bile acid (BA) pool for each individual species and P values for t-test comparing individual BA percentages between groups with comparison noted. CC, maternal control (CON)-offspring chow; HC, maternal high-fat/high-sucrose (HF/HS)-offspring chow; CH, maternal CON-offspring high-transfat, cholesterol, fructose (HTFC); HH, maternal HF/HS-offspring HTFC. n ≥ 8 in each group.

*

Comparisons reaching statistical significance (P < 0.05).