Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;5(2):160–169. doi: 10.1002/cre2.166

Table 2.

The association between RGS5 and various clinicopathologic factors

RGS5 expression
Characteristics High expression Low expression P value
No. of patients 20 23
Age (years) 0.6059
≦70 11 8
70< 12 12
Gender 0.6386
Male 11 11
Female 12 9
Tumor size 0.9202
<20 13 9
20≦ 10 11
T classification 0.4373
T1 10 11
T2 12 9
T3 1 0
N classification 0.6313
N0 21 19
N1 + N2 2 1
Pattern of invasion 0.0037
Expansive type 1 6
Intermediate type 10 12
Infiltrative type 12 2
Differentiation 0.1667
Well 17 18
Moderate + Poor 6 2
Depth of invasion (mm) 0.0463
<4 8 13
4≦ 15 7
Lymphatic vessel invasion 0.0238
Absent 16 19
Present 7 1
Vascular invasion 0.5689
Absent 18 17
Present 5 3
Lymph node metastasis after surgery 0.1684
Absent 9 4
Present 14 16
p16 0.2321
Absent 16 17
Present 7 3

Note. RGS5: regulator of G‐protein signaling 5; Well: well‐differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; Moderate: moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; Poor: poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.