Table 2.
Pairwise comparisons | Difference in the rate of PDFF decline (95% CI) |
---|---|
Segment 5 – Segment 2 | 0.34 (0.11–0.58) |
Segment 5 – Segment 4b | 0.21 (0.03–0.44) |
Segment 6 – Segment 2 | 0.36 (0.12–0.57) |
Segment 6 – Segment 4b | 0.23 (0.04–0.48) |
Segment 7 – Segment 2 | 0.41 (0.06–0.68) |
Segment 7 – Segment 3 | 0.25 (0.04–0.48) |
Segment 7 – Segment 4b | 0.27 (0.02–0.51) |
Segment 8 – Segment 4b | 0.20 (0.04–0.39) |
Right lobe – Left lobe | 0.22 (0.11–0.34) |
PDFF, proton density fat fraction; CI, confidence interval; p-values less than 0.00138 were considered significant at family-wise 0.05 error rate.