Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 6;2017(7):CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6

Klaus 1986.

Methods RCT. Purposefully enrolled more women to the control group. See 'Risk of bias' table below
Participants 465 healthy nulliparous women (186 to support group and 279 to control) in labour at the Social Security Hospital in Guatemala
Interventions Support group: continuous emotional and physical support by a doula.
Control group: usual hospital routines (described as no consistent support)
Outcomes Labour length, use of artificial oxytocin, method of birth, problems during labour and birth, fetal distress, Apgar scores, transfer to neonatal intensive care nursery
Notes No family members permitted to be present. epidural analgesia was not available and EFM was not used routinely
Dates of study: not clear, accepted by journal June 1986
Funding: grants from the Thraher Fund, the Pitway Corporation Charitable Foundation, and the Maternal and Child Health Research (MC‐R‐390430).
Conflicts of interest: not reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Enrolled using randomised design". "Pool of envelopes contained more control group to ensure similar sized groups with uncomplicated labours and deliveries." They anticipated more complications in control group based on an earlier study (Sosa 1980). No information on how allocation sequence was generated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Randomly assigned according to contents of a sealed opaque envelope. Each envelope was numbered sequentially."
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Participants and labour room staff were not blinded to group assignment
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear who assessed the outcomes
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "Mother‐infant pairs were excluded when the mother developed a complication during labour, delivery, or post partum that required special care, if the baby's weight was below 5.5 lbs or above 8 lbs, if there were twins or congenital malformations." This occurred for about 10% of cases in both groups resulting in reported outcomes for 89.6% of those randomised. Unpublished data on the excluded women were provided by the author.
Labour length data were only available for 48.4% of the sample (225 of 465) and thus not included
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes were reported
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias noted