Methods | Double‐blind, single‐centre, placebo‐controlled RCT. Cross‐over design: participants who did not respond after 10 minutes during the first period received the alternative intervention. |
|
Participants | 14 participants with cirrhosis experiencing 18 separate episodes of acute hepatic encephalopathy classified as Grade II to IV (Table 4). Precipitating factors are described (Table 6). Mean ± SD age: whole group 54.8 ± 7.7 years. Proportion of men: 71%. Aetiology of cirrhosis: alcohol 71%; hepatitis B/C 29%. Proportion testing positive for benzodiazepines at baseline (Table 7): 3/14 (21.4%) participants. |
|
Interventions |
Intervention comparison: continuous intravenous infusion flumazenil 0.1 mg/mL at 1 mL/minute flumazenil versus placebo (sodium edetate 1 mg). Investigators stopped the infusion after 10 minutes if participants showed improvement in electroencephalography or coma grade. Total dose of flumazenil: 1 mg. Cointerventions: none described. |
|
Outcomes | Outcomes included in meta‐analyses: mortality, hepatic encephalopathy (Table 3), and serious adverse events (Table 8) assessed after maximum of 3 days. | |
Neuropsychiatric assessment |
Baseline and post infusion: |
|
Inclusion period (date) | May 1988 to May 1990. | |
Country | France. | |
Notes | Included data: the trial included 14 participants who between them experienced 18 episodes of acute hepatic encephalopathy. 1 participant entered the trial once and 1 entered the trial 3 times. We included data from the first intervention period in our analyses. The published report described the number of participants who died after the second treatment period only (Table 8). | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Concealed drug vials. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and personnel. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of outcome assessment. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcome data were complete. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Trial described clinically relevant outcomes. We had no access to information about outcomes described in original protocol or information in trial registries. |
For‐profit funding | High risk | Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd. supplied flumazenil and placebo. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other biases. |
Overall assessment | High risk | High risk of bias. |