Friedman 2009 SEC.
Methods | Prospective, single‐centre RCT of TVT‐Secur versus TVT‐O | |
Participants | 84 women with SUI Patients may have undergone concomitant prolapse surgery Groups well matched for baseline characteristics. |
|
Interventions | TVT‐Secur (Hammock type) (42) TVT‐O (42) |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes were intra‐operative complications, peri‐operative morbidity and post‐operative efficacy (at 1 year) | |
Notes | Abstract only | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No description |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No description |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participant data included in analysis |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No description |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No description |