Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 12;2017(7):CD011821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011821.pub2

Jiao 2015.

Methods Country where data collected: China
Parallel‐group RCT
Unit of randomisation: participant
Unit of analysis: participant (one wound per participant)
Duration: until healed
Participants Inclusion criteria: fresh burn wound; total burn 10%‐20% TBSA; no other serious injury; no other major diseases (including cancer, brain disease; heart disease; kidney disease; haematological system disease; and infection); admitted to hospital within 24 h of injury
Exclusion criteria: NR
Participants 76 hospital patients
Male/female: 44/76 (24/38 vs 20/38)
Age: 18‐58 (36.8 ± 14.2) (36.5 ± 11.8 vs 36.8 ± 13.2
%TBSA: 15.2 (4.3)
Burn degree: superficial: 19 vs 22; deep 19 vs 16
All burns were located around knee areas
Interventions Intervention arm 1: nano‐silver dressing (N =38)
Intervention arm 2: ordinary sterile gauze (N = 38)
Co‐interventions: human epidermal growth factor was coated on the surface of the wound; dressing was changed every other day
Outcomes Primary outcome: wound completely healed
Primary outcome: infection ‐ bacterial positive rate at different time points
Secondary outcome: adverse events; scar hyperplasia
Notes Paper in Chinese; data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessment performed by one review author
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "a randomised table was used"
Comment: not clear how the sequence was generated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no details to indicate whether allocation was adequately concealed
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no details of outcome assessment were given
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: result section and tables show that all participant data were included in analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: unclear based on paper; protocol not obtained
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: no specific quote, no evidence of other sources of bias but reporting insufficient to be certain